robertfl
Premium
join:2005-10-10
Mary Esther, FL | Constitution
anyone remember the constitution? we are innocent until proven guilty - now it's guilty until proven.
this is about greed and CONTROL.
Please wake up, people.
-Rob |
|
redhatnation
Premium
join:2005-06-02
Woodbridge, VA | Don't be a drama queen. No where in that document does Comcast say anything about assuming guilt before innocence. If anything, they appear to be following the letter of the law. |
|
Freezone
join:2000-09-29
Southfield, MI | As much as i generally hate comcast, i must admit they did not sell out customers to the Riaa and NSA.
ATT and Verizon are both looking for a presidential pardon in the form of the veto pen. |
|
redhatnation
Premium
join:2005-06-02
Woodbridge, VA
 ·Comcast
| said by Freezone  :As much as i generally hate comcast, i must admit they did not sell out customers to the Riaa and NSA. ATT and Verizon are both looking for a presidential pardon in the form of the veto pen. Agreed. In this case, Comcast is just complying with the law. They clearly spell out what information is provided, to whom, and reasons when that information is exposed.
Unlike those Verizon folk who think CPNI is theirs to sell to anybody and their mother. |
|
Nightshade
sic semper tyrannis
Premium
join:2002-05-26
Salem, OR
| I am glad that Comcast was open enough to share their privacy polices with the public. It shows me that my ISP provider cares enough about how I feel about privacy rights. It also shows me that they will not give out or volunteer any information unless they are required to by law.
Good job Comcast, and thanks for the information.
--
True Happiness Must Come From Within |
|
