<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Constitution&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Constitution-19262685</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:56:22 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:56:22 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Constitution</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Constitution-19264850</link>
<description><![CDATA[Nightshade posted : I am glad that Comcast was open enough to share their privacy polices with the public. It shows me that my ISP provider cares enough about how I feel about privacy rights. It also shows me that they will not give out or volunteer any information unless they are required to by law.<br><br>Good job Comcast, and thanks for the information.<br><small>--<br>True Happiness Must Come From Within</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Constitution-19264850</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 02:12:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Constitution</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Constitution-19264426</link>
<description><![CDATA[redhatnation posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/210210" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=210210');">Freezone</a>:</small><br><br>As much as i generally hate comcast, i must admit they did not sell out customers to the Riaa and NSA.  <br><br>ATT and Verizon are both looking for a presidential pardon in the form of the veto pen.<br> </div>Agreed.  In this case, Comcast is just complying with the law.  They clearly spell out what information is provided, to whom, and reasons when that information is exposed.<br><br>Unlike those Verizon folk who think CPNI is theirs to sell to anybody and their mother.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Constitution-19264426</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:18:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Constitution</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Constitution-19264244</link>
<description><![CDATA[Freezone posted : As much as i generally hate comcast, i must admit they did not sell out customers to the Riaa and NSA.  <br><br>ATT and Verizon are both looking for a presidential pardon in the form of the veto pen.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Constitution-19264244</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:53:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Constitution</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Constitution-19263436</link>
<description><![CDATA[redhatnation posted : Don't be a drama queen.  No where in that document does Comcast say anything about assuming guilt before innocence.  If anything, they appear to be following the letter of the law.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Constitution-19263436</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:46:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Constitution</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Constitution-19262685</link>
<description><![CDATA[robertfl posted : anyone remember the constitution? we are innocent until proven guilty - now it's guilty until proven.<br><br>this is about greed and CONTROL.<br><br>Please wake up, people. <br><br>-Rob]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Constitution-19262685</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:53:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

