http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19274832 en Wed, 09 Dec 2009 12:13:17 EDT Wed, 09 Dec 2009 12:13:17 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19274832 en102 : Lets assume that I don't watch TV, or use OTA HD or rabbit ears. Why would I want to pay for TV service ? Maybe I want VoIP, Internet and Wireless, but no TV. Why can't I bundle ?
--
Canada = Hollywood North]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19274832 Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:00:46 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19274717 Freezone : U-verse has slightly higher upload. It has tremendous speed upgrade potential. And the vrad will be a lot closer than the CO. So you may only qualify for 1.5 dsl but can get u0verse.

If att wants more money from me all they have to do is sell me higher speed tiers. I would be more than happy to pay for more speed. Upload speed would be really nice.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19274717 Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:46:04 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19274280 guardfrog : If U-verse VDSL offers the same speeds/price points as ADSL, why would someone want to do this?

From the company's standpoint, what sense does it make for them to pay the costs of a truckroll and new CPE for a service that's largely undifferentiated from the ADSL service?

I just don't understand the logic behind the question...]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19274280 Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:37:29 EDT