OS and Software > Webmasters and Developers > View Source Infringes Copyright

View Source Infringes Copyright

Here's the user agreement with this stuff... »www.cybertriallawyer.com/user-agreement it is kind of funny. Whatever you do, DON'T hit view-source when you get to their site or you are breaking the terms.

Search for this to see the good stuff:

quote:

---

As you may know, you can view the HTML code with a standard browser. We do not permit you to view such code since we consider it to be our intellectual property protected by the copyright laws. You are therefore not authorized to do so.

---

These guys need to go back to law school.. Copyright does not give them the right to prevent viewing, as the name implied Copyright is about making copies, not viewing or listening to something

since the html code is already downloaded you your computer when you visit the page, you are not engaging in any further 'copying' in any sense when you select 'view source'

edit: after actually reading the link (shock horror) I see it's about the implicit user agreement not about copyright really, but still on shaky ground to say the least

reply to Jason Levine
They have an ugly website, who want to copy it ?

reply to ihaddsl

reply to Jason Levine
My browser is "viewing" the source in order to display that page. So by visiting that web site, I'm causing my browser to break that law. They might as well have "reading this sentence is against the terms of use for this site" in their copyright statement. It makes about as much sense.

I can understand protecting things, but that's overboard. It's also rather pompous. These guys seem like putzes. Let's make lots of blustery threats and scare the uninitiated. I'm sure there's a grandma in Peoria losing sleep over this, but elsewhere life goes on unchanged.
--
It's my universe and I can look at it any way I want.
--

Those guys could have saved a lot of time by replacing all that verbiage with:

reply to Jason Levine
This isn't surprising, read the tag line on the main page: We Protect the Reputations and the Intellectual Property of Businesses on the Web.

Mr Dozier is a scumbag lawyer. Nothing to see here, move along.
--
Official BBR Grouch

reply to Jason Levine
Wow. Just when you thought they couldn't get any slimier, it turns out that they are proud spammer lawyers also! »www.cybertriallawyer.com/commerc···ail-spam

Maybe the prohibition against linking to or viewing the source code of their site is a good thing. If no one (including Google) linked to their site, maybe they would go out of business.

reply to Jason Levine
Probably trying to setup Google for some sort of lawsuit when the spider comes a-knockin..

reply to Jason Levine
however isnt there a text file you can put in your main web directory that basicly tells google not to index you if you want to remain unlisted?
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports

reply to Jason Levine

quote:

---

What is Website Copyright Infringement?

Copyright law protects original creative work. When you take someone's work, that act can be copyright infringement. On a website, creative works can include:

* The words used (text).
* The graphics and images used.
* The data present.
* The HTML code, other code, and scripts.

---

reply to Dersgniw

reply to Jason Levine
I think the worse part is that they must actually get clients.

Its sad when companies don't know what they are getting themselves into. I saw a designers portfolio today that landed a really nice job. I got the address from the card and the site and portfolio sites really look like a preschooler did them. Worse then some of the worse Ive seen. And these are major corporations...

I amazed people would hire these people based on statements like that. I doubt if they got al gore "the creator of the internet" or whatever any of that bs would hold up in court. Id like to take their html and style it differently with css just to tempt them
--
Connecticut Web Design and Development

reply to Jason Levine
So, who wants to use their Legal Matter Submission page to send them their own source code? »www.cybertriallawyer.com/legal-matter (whoops, I guess I shouldn't have linked them )
--
Here to help all those in need, whenever I can.

reply to Jason Levine
These guys need to be locked up in a rubber room to protect them from themselves.

reply to Jason Levine
Thank you for the link to this site. I'll keep the link to it as vivid example of stupidity of Internet law firm.
--
Keep it simple, it'll become complex by itself...

reply to Jason Levine
This is the same law firm that tried to copyright their
own Cease & Desist notice, which Public Citizen then
called them out about it and posted it and a scathing
reply (also sent to them). This was concerning such a
notice sent to a website called infomercialscams.com and
some related sites over calling Directbuy a scam (which
it is.) They did this in order to try and avoid the
Streisand Effect, but really all they did was draw more
unwanted attention to themselves, daring people to flout
their so-called "copyright".

Let's see. Spammers as clients. These guys are definitely
cart00neys.
--
"The trouble with computers, of course, is that they are very sophisticated idiots." - Doctor Who (from Robot)

reply to Jason Levine
That sucks.
--
2001 Pontiac Firebird V6 3.8L

Mods:
Flowmasters Cat-back Exhaust System
Cold Air Intake

reply to Jason Levine