1 edit | Less than $45,000 didn't buy Rockefeller That amount of money is pocket change for a Senator's contributions to his campaigns. So Verizon and AT&T and its employees didn't buy a vote. The amount of money needed to BUY a senator is in the millions.
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page |
|
| So you refuse to admit any correlation between campaign donations over the last year and legislation?
I would say the graph is pretty representative of what is going on.
If I were a statistics major I'd say with about 95% certainty there is correlation |
|
|
|
 DownTheShoreTag, you're itPremium
join:2003-12-02
Beautiful NJ
kudos:11 | reply to fAcEtIOUs
Whether the contributions "bought" his vote or not, they surely influenced it.
For those interested in making their feelings known about this matter to him, here's his website:
»www.senate.gov/~rockefeller/
--
Life is simply one damned thing after another. |
|
 HangmnDon't Fight It...It's InevitablePremium
join:2000-04-08
Philadelphia, PA | reply to fAcEtIOUs
Re: Less than $45,000 didn't buy Rockefeller said by fAcEtIOUs:That amount of money is pocket change for a Senator's contributions to his campaigns. So Verizon and AT&T and its employees didn't buy a vote. The amount of money needed to BUY a senator is in the millions. They don't need to BUY a Rockefeller he is squarely in line with the new world order, his family has been for generations.
--
»davescustompc.com |
|
