 WileECmindtaker, macky cat, etc.
join:2002-02-07
Yonkers, NY
 ·Verizon FiOS
| Woah! Shocka! More sourpuss left wing slanted conspiracy stupidity coming from BBR!
Not even worth my time to comment here - waste of time.. The liberals who eat this up will eat it up regardless of the facts or situation. They wonder why congress is completely ineffective... it's not because of Bush, it's because the likes of Pelosi and Reid keep pandering to the extreme left (aka nutcases) and they keep losing. The democrats who took over congress are completely out of touch and after insane rants like the one Pete Stark made yesterday, I'm sure they will continue to make themselves look like the incompetent fools they are.
Funny thing about all this is that the liberals who would call even military recruiters criminals would just LOVE and I mean LOVE to live under the regime of our enemies - where women have no rights, homosexuals are killed and in general, all civil rights are dictated by interpretations of "holy books" written by doped up so-called prophets 1400 years ago. You would think the left would wise up, but of course, I know that's simply not possible - after all, the alternate reality they live in is inescapable. |
|
| Woah, so far off subject, what a waste of keystrokes. Hey, I heard Newt Gingrich likes Cheese Doodles and sardine sandwiches. |
|
 ieolusSupport The Clecs
join:2001-06-19
Duluth, GA | He also divorces his sick-in-the-hospital wife to be with his mistress... while at the same time trying to inpeach the sitting president for a hummer, but whatevah.
--
"Speak for yourself "Chadmaster" - lesopp |
|
 MacWin
join:2003-06-26
Imperial, MO | reply to WileEC
Why don't you actully comment on the facts in the thread instead of going off on your O'Reilly, Hannity, Limbaugh, Coulter, Fox Noise, soundbite rant. |
|
| Because he HAS NO FACTS. People like him need to be introduced to the business end of a baseball bat...
Just like Fox- it's all irrelevant opinion with no substantial argument (if there is ANY argument given at all- here there is NONE!) |
|
lesopp
join:2001-06-27
Land O Lakes, FL | reply to ieolus
It wasn't about the hummer, it was lying under oath about the hummer. |
|
| reply to boober321
Another of those nothing to hide genius. His village must be missing its idiot  |
|
|
|
lesopp
join:2001-06-27
Land O Lakes, FL | reply to boober321
Its a good thing we don't have that "rubber stamp" congress, now Bush won't get his way anymore.
Oh wait he's still getting his way, time to turn up the rhetoric.  |
|
| reply to lesopp
said by lesopp:It wasn't about the hummer, it was lying under oath about the hummer. yes, and doesn't it seem quaint compared to now? it's like we caught him with too many pens in his desk, comparitively speaking... |
|
amungusPremium
join:2004-11-26
America Reviews:
 ·AT&T DSL Service
| reply to WileEC
Wow.
How about you take a few moments of your oh so precious time and do some actual thinking about what you have said?
Not worth your efforts? Oh, I suppose I can hold your hand through a couple of your problems. Just like the kid who copied all the answers, you may never fully understand, but I'll try to help anyway.
1) conspiracy. My favorite definition from here: »dictionary.reference.com/browse/conspiracy
"2. an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot."
... evil... unlawful... hmm...
Evil and unlawful. That sounds more like what we have trouble understanding about the telco's! Formulated in secret... yes, that is exactly what happened with the telco's and the gov't... by two or more persons. I know, math may be difficult for some, but 1+1=2, really, it does.
2) "The liberals who eat this up will eat it up regardless of the facts or situation. They wonder why congress is completely ineffective"
...The liberals. Fine, talk smack on said category of people. Regardless of facts or situation? That's just ignorant. Ignorant because your blind assumption that any and all such categorized people are illiterate, is classic stereotyping in a derogatory manner. Wondering why Congress is ineffective??? It is somewhat, but if you think it's completely ineffective, then why do you care so much about how our current system of checks and balances is set up???
If you then DO care, then your logic has just fallen apart at the seams. If you care, then you'd care to see some logical debate on the matter. If you don't, and you'd rather believe that everything is just dandy, then you might as well include yourself in the crowd you so despise.
3) "after all, the alternate reality they live in is inescapable."
Then per the above logic, yours must also be as inescapable.
I don't care if you think it's all a waste of time, just say so. Why lower yourself to an illogical and trash talking level when you also state that it's not worth your time posting?
....
Hope everyone has a good weekend, regardless of political affiliation, orientation, or any other category. |
|
lesopp
join:2001-06-27
Land O Lakes, FL | reply to satellite68
Quaint, how so?
The former plead guilty to lying under oath. With the latter all we have is allegations, hearsay and innuendo, essentially all the things that sustain the political divisiveness.
I believe the reason we haven't seen the dems go forward with impeachment is that there would have to be an actual crime, something provable in a court of law and not just sound bites. |
|
| reply to satellite68
Cheese Doodles, fine.
But the accusation about the sardine sanswiches has come from a vast left wing conspiracy within the MoveOn.org party. It just ain't true. |
|
ieolusSupport The Clecs
join:2001-06-19
Duluth, GA | reply to lesopp
No, it was about the hummer... since he should never have been questioned about it, under oath or not.
--
"Speak for yourself "Chadmaster" - lesopp |
|
 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·AT&T DSL Service
| reply to WileEC
 |
|
 ThalerPremium
join:2004-02-02
Los Angeles, CA
kudos:3
·DSL EXTREME
| reply to MacWin
said by MacWin:Why don't you actully comment on the facts in the thread instead of going off on your O'Reilly, Hannity, Limbaugh, Coulter, Fox Noise, soundbite rant. Because it's easier to have other people do the thinking for you, and then regurgitate said soundbites in an attempt to look smart. (or something, don't know. I'd rather not imagine the kinds of women those windbags pick up.) |
|
