Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » AT&T Sues Vonage » Waiting for the anti-Vonage fan boys...
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
I give them a year! »
« Vonage commercial..  
AuthorAll Replies


tc1uscg

join:2005-03-09
Saint Clair Shores, MI
·Comcast
·WOW Internet and C..
·VoiceEclipse


edit:
October 24th, @03:18AM

reply to hottboiinnc
Re: Waiting for the anti-Vonage fan boys...

But TWC isn't everywhere. I knew only of AOL since they seem to be the name everyone relates to. In my area, it's Comcast, WOW, AT&T, and I think there was a article in the paper about it. But anyway.. it never fails that when customers benefits, they (the consumer) seem to think it's ok for another provider to erode on other providers right-of-way, programing, infrastructure and R&D. Sorta like a dog circling the table hoping for a scrap to fall from the table. I'm not knocking Vonage as a service, just they and it's customers need to understand that what they were doing wasn't right and are now paying the price, as they should have from the get go. That's why I said Sprint did the smart thing and cut them some slack. The others should too.

hottboiinnc
Kyle

join:2003-10-15
Toledo, OH
·buckeye cable

The thing though is with Vonage though some of the patents that VZ says they own were open source at one time. And Vonage seen that they were open source so used them. You shouldnt be able to take something that is open source and throw your name on it and say its yours when you didnt develop it. And on top that of VZ never developed the items anyway. they were MCI's. VZ only got them because of the merger of VZ Business and MCI.

Once open source always open source. Someone shouldnt be able to claim its theres regardless of what happened. Really the only one that should be able to claim anything is the Bell Labs may have some say in it. But then again There is not a Bell Labs anymore. What was Lucent is now some other company (can't remember their name but their name is attached to VZW's ads in news papers). But still. VZ, Sprint, and ATT shouldnt be doing this just to put them out of business like they want to or to claim something is there's because they stamped the Bell name all over it but even then Sprint never was a bell and don't think they even developed anything.

Vonage really isnt paying a price but dragging them through court. Vonage will always be here until either they can't survive because of the bells or the Cable Co's but either way someone would buy them up. Prolly even Packet8 since they have no dependency on the bell$ for technology.


tc1uscg

join:2005-03-09
Saint Clair Shores, MI
Agree.
Forums » AT&T Sues VonageI give them a year! »
« Vonage commercial..  


Monday, 13-Oct 10:59:00 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [8] AT&T To Sell U-Verse At Walmart, Circuit City
· [8] FCC's Smut-Free Broadband Plan Goes Forward
· [5] Virgin: Our 50Mbps Tier Breaks Your Speed Tests
Most people now reading
· Why do mustangs sound so good? [Automotive]
· Extreme HD and Essentials [Verizon FIOS TV]
· [Connectivity] Tracert problems, can't connect to some sites. [Comcast HSI]
· Hit from behind [General Questions]
· IMG 1.6 Build 06.89 Released [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Man with 36 accounts, raids by himself [World of Warcraft]
· When do we get rid of FYI for the guide? [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Safty Question about K & T wiring. Very worried... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Flu Shot...good or bad?? [Rants, Raves, & Praise]
· Does Boston have a free store? [New England]