| reply to 81399672
Re: If running a business, then email should be own domain ... said by 81399672:said by fAcEtIOUs:... and when switching ISPs, then there is no issue about forwarding at all. What we don't need is government getting in to the business of deciding how an ISP runs their business on a day to day basis and how they manage email access. Is that an official or unofficial statement of comcast and other affiliated isp Why not give up on the constant replies to my posts that suggest I work for Comcast or some other provider. As I've said here many times, I NEVER worked for a telecom or cable company and I am now retired. So my opinions are my own and not purchased as you continually imply. But I guess when you have nothing to say that is the best you can do as a form of discourse.
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page |
|
| reply to Anon
Re: If running a business, then email should be own domain ... said by 81399672:If you do not work for any of them, why are you always defending any and all of them. Be it RIAA, comcast or any other company period. I haven't seen you post against them, it's always to defend them. As result it's clearly demonstrates that you get some type of benefit by posting such comments He has a right to an opinion, same as you do. Just because you don't agree with him doesn't mean he's working for somebody. For what its worth, I usually agree with him in part or in whole as well, and I'm not "working" for anybody. For my part, I simply don't like the idea of running to Washington to solve problems that don't exist. If this lady was so reliant on her AOL e-mail for business, then that's her own fault.
Besides, anybody remember the last time the US Postal Service won any awards for outstanding delivery?
--
"Don't steal. The government hates competition."
Fred Thompson For President 2008 »www.fred08.com |
|
cacoPremium
join:2005-03-10
Whittier, AK
1 edit | reply to Anon
Re: If running a business, then email should be own domain ... said by 81399672:If you do not work for any of them, why are you always defending any and all of them. Be it RIAA, comcast or any other company period. I haven't seen you post against them, it's always to defend them. As result it's clearly demonstrates that you get some type of benefit by posting such comments Should I assume that you work for a law firm since you are always wanting to take someone to court or sue for damages ?
--
»www.seabee.navy.mil |
|
 RobIn Deo speramus, God Bless the USAPremium
join:2001-08-25
Kendall, FL
kudos:2 | reply to Anon
said by 81399672:If you do not work for any of them, why are you always defending any and all of them. Be it RIAA, comcast or any other company period. I haven't seen you post against them, it's always to defend them. As result it's clearly demonstrates that you get some type of benefit by posting such comments He doesn't defend the RIAA, he defends the law.
Government shouldn't be involved in the day to day activities of a company, or of its people. The FCC shouldn't be mandating what an ISP does with an email address of a customer who no longer pays for their service.
If a person is running a business, then they shouldn't be using an @aol.com email, or any ISP email. They should have their own domain. In fact, I would even extend that to everyone; everyone should have their own domain instead of relying on their ISPs email address.
You sure as heck post a lot of nonsense, so that clearly demonstrates you have no idea what you are talking about. |
|
 81399672Premium
join:2006-05-17
Los Angeles, CA
kudos:2 | reply to caco
said by caco:said by 81399672:If you do not work for any of them, why are you always defending any and all of them. Be it RIAA, comcast or any other company period. I haven't seen you post against them, it's always to defend them. As result it's clearly demonstrates that you get some type of benefit by posting such comments Should I assume that you work for a law firm since you are always wanting to take someone to court or sue? If you actually read my comments you would see that i do not always say sue or take them to court. Also i say it in general way when i say sue etc, tch is always anit consumer, and pro business etc. |
|
 ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4
 ·VOIPo
| reply to Anon
Re: If running a business, then email should be own domain ... said by 81399672:If you do not work for any of them, why are you always defending any and all of them. Be it RIAA, comcast or any other company period. I haven't seen you post against them, it's always to defend them. As result it's clearly demonstrates that you get some type of benefit by posting such comments Hire a laywer and sue him. |
|
| reply to Anon
In my world...all "miffed aol users" shall be treated equal, and have all of the rights granted by the constitution!
--
Where have the adults gone? |
|
| reply to Anon
If it's so offensive to you, why post at all? |
|
 Jim GurdPremium
join:2000-07-08
Plymouth, MI | reply to Rob
Re: If running a business, then email should be own domain ... said by Rob:If a person is running a business, then they shouldn't be using an @aol.com email, I've seen law firms with an @aol.com e-mail address.
--
We don't care. We don't have to. We're the phone company.
-- Ernestine |
|
RobIn Deo speramus, God Bless the USAPremium
join:2001-08-25
Kendall, FL
kudos:2 | said by Jim Gurd:said by Rob:If a person is running a business, then they shouldn't be using an @aol.com email, I've seen law firms with an @aol.com e-mail address. Scary. It's not uncommon, at least down here, to see @aol or @bellsouth e-mail addresses printed on vans for small businesses. |
|
| reply to 81399672
Whats wrong with being pro-business?
--
Where have the adults gone? |
|
81399672Premium
join:2006-05-17
Los Angeles, CA
kudos:2 | said by S_engineer:Whats wrong with being pro-business? Nothing!!, except when you are totally pro business and not objective about it |
|
quatrixPremium
join:2005-02-11
Davie, FL
kudos:2 | reply to 81399672
said by 81399672:Also i say it in general way when i say sue etc, tch is always anit consumer, and pro business etc. Anti-crime and anti-theft doesn't mean anti-consumer. |
|
| reply to 81399672
Nothing he said made him non-objective....he made a point about this entitlement attitude that alot of people carry nowadays. There was nothing in his response that should have been deleted or to make him look non-objective.
By censoring his position...who looks non-objective now?
--
Where have the adults gone? |
|
 hopeflickerCapitalism breeds greedPremium
join:2003-04-03
Long Beach, CA
kudos:1 | reply to S_engineer
said by S_engineer:Whats wrong with being pro-business? pro business = corruption = greed = less power
--
People pray to God because they're told to. |
|
