 La LunaSurvived AshrafulPremium
join:2001-07-12
Warwick, NY
kudos:3
 ·Vonage
 ·Optimum Online
| $23 a month? For the current *new* crap that's out there? Uh, no thank you. Why would I want to pay $23 a month for one or two songs every couple of months, if that many? I already have the really good songs that I like, it's rare that there's anything new that's decent.
If they charged a REASONABLE fee PER song, I might consider it.
--
JIHAD WATCH~~9828 DEADLY TERROR ATTACKS SINCE 9/11~~TEAM DISCOVERY |
|
Reviews:
 ·Verizon FiOS
| agree - $23/month is too much. EFF has promoted this concept for years, but they always talked about $5/month or so.
I would do $5/month. The problem would be people that are very price sensitive and only able to afford the lowest tier, say $15/mo; going from $15 to $20/mo is a 33% increase. |
|
 nwrickertsand groperPremium,MVM
join:2004-09-04
Geneva, IL
kudos:7 | reply to La Luna
If this were 23 cents per month (or $0.23), then I would probably put up with it, even though I don't download music. But $23 per month is absurd. |
|
