Corona
It's cool, I'm takin it back
Premium
join:2000-03-14
Aubrey, TX | Re: That's just wrong..... Sucks to go through it, but in theory, wouldn't homeowners insurance cover things like this? | |
|
 
mindfrost82
join:2003-04-19
Cortland, IL | Re: That's just wrong..... I'm sure it would, so they'll eventually get reimburse for it, but until then, they want their money right away so they have to fork it over.
--
F R O S T Y
www.mindfrost82.com | |
|
|
 | 
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·Comcast
| Re: That's just wrong..... said by N3OGH  :said by Corona :Sucks to go through it, but in theory, wouldn't homeowners insurance cover things like this? Sure but between the time AT&T and Dish want their cash, and the time the home owner gets a settlement check for the $300, she/he's out the $300. The houses being burnt down are worth millions. They can afford to pay the bill.
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page | |
|
| | moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
 ·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: That's just wrong..... said by TKJunkMail :The houses being burnt down are worth millions. They can afford to pay the bill. You know this how?
Shouldn't matter what that house costs since cost of living is different all over the country. While that same house may cost $250,000 where I live, it may cost more where they live but their pay will reflect that too. | |
|
| | | jjeffeory
join:2002-12-04
USA | Re: That's just wrong..... From experience...
The pay will not neccesarily reflect that. | |
|
| | | | moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: That's just wrong..... said by jjeffeory :From experience... The pay will not necessarily reflect that. So you know what houses cost just by the large area they are in? 
Unless someone shows me the address and the records of house sales on the same street, you can't tell me how much a house is worth just by looking at it or its location. | |
|
| | | | | 
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME
| Re: That's just wrong..... As a resident of SoCal, you'll be hard pressed to find even a piece of vacant land to build on worth less than $250,000.
On the other side, just because the house may be worth +$500,000, (most in SoCal are), doesn't mean that
A) People are rich (many spend +1 income just to pay mortgage and taxes)
B) They have money. Some may have bought the house back in the 90's or earlier for --
Canada = Hollywood North | |
|
| | | | | | 
S_engineer
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL
·Comcast
| Re: That's just wrong..... One reason people scrap for a home in a semi affluent area is for an investment. I live in a nice area and I'm far from rich. Tack on my kids pending college tuition and you could consider me broke!~
The death Star wants the money...fine...send it to them in pennies and cancel your account!
--
Where have the adults gone? | |
|
| | | | | Thaler
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA
| said by moonpuppy :Unless someone shows me the address and the records of house sales on the same street, you can't tell me how much a house is worth just by looking at it or its location. Reminds me of the houses on Venice Beach. The houses themselves look very "rustic" (ie. shithouses riding bare minimum up to code), but the property they sit on is worth millions. | |
|
| | | | | |
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | Re: That's just wrong..... I tend to agree... the homes here aren't worth anything (except contractors that want to add on will charge a boat load of $$$ for any change).
Marina Del Ray has VERY nice condos.
--
Canada = Hollywood North | |
|
| | | | | | | Thaler
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA
| Re: That's just wrong..... said by en102 :I tend to agree... the homes here aren't worth anything (except contractors that want to add on will charge a boat load of $$$ for any change). Oh, but of course. With property values like those on the beachfront, contractors KNOW residents can afford to pay through the nose. I'm sure the city also tacks on a nice hefty tax/fee wherever they can for home remodeling. | |
|
| | | | | emptywig
Huh? What?
Premium
join:2002-08-05
Pasadena, TX
| Yeah, you can certainly know what a house is worth just by knowing what area its in.
I can say with a pretty good degree of certainty that any house in, say, Tokyo, no matter how small, is probably worth nearly a million dollars.
I can also tell you that those numbers are completely relative, and just because your house is worth a million doesn't mean you have a millionaire lifestyle. A million dollars is a lot more money if you live in Houston than if you live in NYC or LA. If I had to, I could probably find an $80,000 house here in the Houston area that I'd be happy to live in. I don't think I could find a cardboard box on a piece of lawn in all of Southern California for that amount of money.
wig
--
Sometimes a paradox is just a paradox | |
|
| | |
| | | quatrix
Premium
join:2005-02-11
Davie, FL
| Re: That's just wrong..... said by ptrowski :Wow, really? I did not know fire only target high end homes. Oh wait, it doesn't. But wildfires start in the hills, where the most expensive homes tend to be. | |
|
| | | | |
| | 
BF69
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN
2 edits | said by TKJunkMail :said by N3OGH :said by Corona :Sucks to go through it, but in theory, wouldn't homeowners insurance cover things like this? Sure but between the time AT&T and Dish want their cash, and the time the home owner gets a settlement check for the $300, she/he's out the $300. The houses being burnt down are worth millions. They can afford to pay the bill. At&t has BILLIONS of $ they can wait a few weeks for the insurance company to give them $300 | |
|
| | 
yock
TFTC
Premium
join:2000-11-21
Fairfield, OH
| said by TKJunkMail :said by N3OGH :said by Corona :Sucks to go through it, but in theory, wouldn't homeowners insurance cover things like this? Sure but between the time AT&T and Dish want their cash, and the time the home owner gets a settlement check for the $300, she/he's out the $300. The houses being burnt down are worth millions. They can afford to pay the bill. That shouldn't even factor into the equation. AT&T can wait, like all of their other debtors and leinholders, for homeowner's insurance to indemnify the policyholders. | |
|
| | |
| | |
Corona
It's cool, I'm takin it back
Premium
join:2000-03-14
Aubrey, TX | Re: That's just wrong..... WTH does New Jersey have to do with this? | |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | 
DownTheShore
Maddie Knows Poopie
Premium
join:2003-12-02
Beautiful NJ
clubs:
| Re: That's just wrong..... Immaterial. Every state has aspects that are not favorable, whether they're envionmental, economic, political, or social. We are just paying the price of the economic growth that benefited the entire country.
There's still beautiful places and people here. It's a great place to live, and I'm just tired of it being considered some sort of joke state by people who've never lived here.
~stepping off soapbox~
--
Life is simply one damned thing after another. | |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | jjeffeory
join:2002-12-04
USA | I was in Katrina. Charter cable sent us bills for months that their cable lines were down. I don't know what Cox did, but Charter didn't help too much. | |
|
| | | 
supergirl
join:2007-03-20
Pensacola, FL | New Jersey is just a suburb of NY.  | |
|
| | | 
KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest
| said by Transmaster :This doesn't sound like the Dish Network (DN) I know. This isn't DN. This is AT&T's bundled Dish deal. If they had service thru DN, this wouldn't even be a problem. In fact when I moved years ago Dish Network let me use DishMover and suspended (IE I didn't pay to turn off or turn back on, but was not billed for a couple of months) my service while I got situated and then reinstalled. I think I paid em a $5 a month just to keep my grandfathered East West Network feeds up, because if you turned em off you couldn't get them back.)
This is purely AT&T for ya... and a sign of how DN will be in the future if the rumored buyout does happen, most likely.
--
"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!) | |
|
| | 
markwp2001
Spreadhead
Premium
join:2002-05-25
Long Beach, MS
| said by TKJunkMail :said by N3OGH :said by Corona :Sucks to go through it, but in theory, wouldn't homeowners insurance cover things like this? Sure but between the time AT&T and Dish want their cash, and the time the home owner gets a settlement check for the $300, she/he's out the $300. The houses being burnt down are worth millions. They can afford to pay the bill. Now that's an ignorant, ill-informed, stupid statement. Congrats.
--
LHF's Football Master 2006 | |
|
| | |
| | eric89074
join:2004-08-13
Henderson, NV | "The houses being burnt down are worth millions. They can afford to pay the bill."
Insurance doesn't pay the "worth" of the house it pays the cost to rebuild it and replace the items in it. | |
|
| | | 
bjl
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Newport Beach, CA | Re: That's just wrong..... If you're lucky. | |
|
| | 
GlobalMind
Domino Dude, POWER Systems Guy
Premium
join:2001-10-29
Hollywood, FL
1 edit | said by TKJunkMail :said by N3OGH :said by Corona :Sucks to go through it, but in theory, wouldn't homeowners insurance cover things like this? Sure but between the time AT&T and Dish want their cash, and the time the home owner gets a settlement check for the $300, she/he's out the $300. The houses being burnt down are worth millions. They can afford to pay the bill. Thanks, but really that's not the point. I could probably pay the bill too if my home were destroyed by wildfire or in my case, hurricane.
It wouldn't change the fact that it is purely bad form to do business this way as the "corporate citizen."
AT&T / Dish make billions of dollars a year. They can afford the write-off. | |
|
| | | Thaler
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA
| Re: That's just wrong..... said by GlobalMind :It wouldn't change the fact that it is purely bad form to do business this way as the "corporate citizen." AT&T / Dish make billions of dollars a year. They can afford the write-off. And that's the perfect response to TKJunkMail 's post. | |
|
| | | | |
| | 
Deckoh
i have..so there for i have
Premium
join:2002-07-24
San Diego, CA | quote:
The houses being burnt down are worth millions. They can afford to pay the bill.
Now thats just a dumb comment. Better yet stupid! | |
|
| | 
Cheese
Premium
join:2003-10-26
Naples, FL
clubs:
| said by TKJunkMail :said by N3OGH :said by Corona :Sucks to go through it, but in theory, wouldn't homeowners insurance cover things like this? Sure but between the time AT&T and Dish want their cash, and the time the home owner gets a settlement check for the $300, she/he's out the $300. The houses being burnt down are worth millions. They can afford to pay the bill. I am pretty sure not all of the houses are worth millions | |
|
| | 
tma
@ca.us
| How do you know these houses are worth millions? My aunt's house in Running Springs burnt down, a small cabin worth maybe $150,000 and DISH Network wants $600 for the receivers in her livingroom and the one in my grandmother's room. They are not wealthy people. Far too many generalizations about people in CA are being made. | |
|
| | 
Oleg
Bellsouth Fastaccess
Premium
join:2003-12-08
Birmingham, AL
2 edits | said by TKJunkMail :said by N3OGH :said by Corona :Sucks to go through it, but in theory, wouldn't homeowners insurance cover things like this? Sure but between the time AT&T and Dish want their cash, and the time the home owner gets a settlement check for the $300, she/he's out the $300. The houses being burnt down are worth millions. They can afford to pay the bill. I am sure AT&T and Dish Network makes more money than any average person makes,but i could be wrong | |
|
| | |
| 
SuperJoker
join:2005-11-21
Yermo, CA
·Verizon Online DSL
·Verizon west (ex G..
| said by N3OGH :said by Corona :Sucks to go through it, but in theory, wouldn't homeowners insurance cover things like this? Sure but between the time AT&T and Dish want their cash, and the time the home owner gets a settlement check for the $300, she/he's out the $300. So instead of buying some replacement clothes, or a few nights in a motel room, they're stuck paying this garbage bill. AT&T are going to get some seriously bad press out of this, and sure they'll rescind the fee, but that's not the point. Just more proof AT&T totally sucks the root. At least now I know to stay away from Dish network as well. What a bunch of ass hats... I wonder now, Why would AT&T want the Dish Network box back? I mean last I looked Dish Network is still owned by Echostar and AT&T hasn't bought either one of them as of yet. But then I own My HD Dish Network box outright, Although one time a rep from Dish Network did try and say that they owned It, Until I objected as I had a receipt from when I bought the box online, Then Dish looked It up and said I was right and apologized.
--
(14.70GHz crunchin 4 SETI w/the PC Perspective Killer Frogs) | |
|
JSRoman
Premium
join:2005-03-10
Callahan, FL | Yes, it should. If they owned the equipment it wouldn't be a problem.
--
»www.seabee.navy.mil | |
|
Enlightener
join:2006-01-28
Cedar Park, TX | Actually I wonder if hazard insurance would cover it or not since the policy holder doesn't actually own the equipment. | |
|
|
yock
TFTC
Premium
join:2000-11-21
Fairfield, OH
| Re: That's just wrong..... said by Enlightener :Actually I wonder if hazard insurance would cover it or not since the policy holder doesn't actually own the equipment. Since the box is a leased item and under the custodian of the homeowner, contents coverage should pay for the box. | |
|
| |
| |
yock
TFTC
Premium
join:2000-11-21
Fairfield, OH
| Re: That's just wrong..... said by TKJunkMail :said by Enlightener :Actually I wonder if hazard insurance would cover it or not since the policy holder doesn't actually own the equipment. Probably no insurance covers it. Homeowners won't cover rented equipment. And AT&T is, like most large corporations, self-insured up to about 100's of millions to a billion dollars. So, if the people don't pay, AT&T eats the loss. I did some research, and I don't believe you are correct. Check your homeowner's policy under Coverage C. There might very well be a provision in it to cover the property of others while it is on your premises. I found a specific example, but I'm reluctant to share my employer's proprietary information. | |
|
| | |
S_engineer
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL
·Comcast
| Re: That's just wrong..... correct, my policy covers item that are on my property that I do not own. This of course is up a certain amount.
I think this certainly doesen't improve the PR battle with ATT. This is as pimpy as a business can come!
--
Where have the adults gone? | |
|
blah blah blah
@adobe.com | Depends on the insurance. Some policies may only pay for the rebuilding of the house and not the contents. Does this come under act of God? Sometimes, they don't pay for those... | |
|
|
|
|
·
·
