| reply to ztmike
Re: Comcasts position on this sounds pretty clear to me It's about avoiding capital investment in infrastructure. The sooner the average Comcast user understands that they are nothing but a device that adds money to Comcast's cash reserves, so they can acquire and expand, or just sit on that cash, to the delight of Wall Street analysts, the closer they will be to the nominative societal norm of sanity. Sandvine boxes are cheaper than splitting nodes and running new copper.
Any other explanation is either lunacy or the result of employment by Direct Impact. Or both. |
