<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Why not make an Universal Device&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-not-make-an-Universal-Device-19346211</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:16:47 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:16:47 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Why not make an Universal Device</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-not-make-an-Universal-Device-19349646</link>
<description><![CDATA[DaveRb posted : ANSI and MAP are for the Network Subsystem, MSC to MSC and MSC to HLR. Wi-MAX is the access side which would compare to the Basestation Sub-system, IOS, BSSAP, RNAP, etc.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-not-make-an-Universal-Device-19349646</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:27:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why not make an Universal Device</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-not-make-an-Universal-Device-19346324</link>
<description><![CDATA[en102 posted : They could (and in the past have) done some cross back end infrastructure.<br>Eg.  CDMA / GSM phones for Verizon and Sprint<br>GAIT (GSM/TDMA/Analog) phones for Cingular and AT&T Wireless<br>WiFi/GSM/UMTS and WiFi/CDMA/EVDO for wireless data cards<br><br>Typically, they're different back end platforms (i.e. ANSI vs. MAP) vs. ??? for WiMax using various types of hardware registrations (ESN on AMPS/TDMA/CDMA vs. IMEI+SIM for GSM/UMTS) .  I suspect that MAC addresses would be used on WiMAX and many other data centric devices.<br><small>--<br>Canada = Hollywood North</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-not-make-an-Universal-Device-19346324</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:41:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Why not make an Universal Device</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Why-not-make-an-Universal-Device-19346211</link>
<description><![CDATA[LowRider posted : could they not make a device (IE: like a laptop wireless card that is A,B,G,N).  couldn't they just do that instead if its going to cost a lot, i mean i have no knowledge in this area but could it not work?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Why-not-make-an-Universal-Device-19346211</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:21:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

