| Proposition J(free WiFi) - Vote NO The conceit for free universal Wi-Fi is that it will enable young people to log on to learn more about famine in Africa or health tips. Yeah, right. Sorry, but it would be more likely to present a huge windfall for MySpace, not to mention Internet porn. I think people can pay for those pursuits.
The Special City does not need free Wi-Fi. The free market works. Residents can purchase Wi-Fi access from a number of companies. Laptop owners can access free Wi-Fi if they buy a cup of coffee at many coffee shops. Or they can go to the San Francisco Main Library for free Wi-Fi - as well as the use of a computer; 20 library branches also offer a free ride on the Internet. Free WiFi in San Francisco is just one more wet dream by SF's commie mayor. Vote NO. |
|
 gaforcesUnited We Stand, Divided We Fall
join:2002-04-07
Santa Cruz, CA | Why should I care what happens in San Francisco? If they want more net access, letem have it.
They need wireless just to get rid of all the ugly cables and lines that make sf an eyesore.
The contract they had with earrthlink was horrible, 16 year contract is rediculous when technology is obsolete ever 6 mo to a year.
A commie? Wtf is this 1975 coldwar?
--
‘Do ye, quieting in your bosoms your strong hearts,
Who of many good things have had your fill even to surfeit,
With what is moderate nourish your mighty desire; for neither will
We yield, nor shall you have all else as you wish.’
Solon |
|
| said by gaforces:They need wireless just to get rid of all the ugly cables and lines that make sf an eyesore. I'm pretty sure wireless power delivery isn't in the scope of this project, nor is forcing every telco and cableco to switch to wireless, so it's not going to make a difference.
And also, no not the 70's coldwar, it's McCarthyism all over again, so watch your back. |
|
gaforcesUnited We Stand, Divided We Fall
join:2002-04-07
Santa Cruz, CA | The money changers have built thier own temples, wheres jesus when ye need him? |
|
