 extreme50Formerly TwoKDialupPremium
join:2002-06-07
Coloma, MI | reply to satellite68
Re: ...wait for it said by satellite68:<snip> Neither perspective will be accurate, or correct, but will nonetheless get posted here anyways. Please enlighten us with the correct perspective.
--
Meet Bill and Karolyn at www.theslowskys.com |
|
| said by extreme50:said by satellite68:<snip> Neither perspective will be accurate, or correct, but will nonetheless get posted here anyways. Please enlighten us with the correct perspective. Perhaps a "wink" or [sarcasm on] would have been appropriate...  |
|
extreme50Formerly TwoKDialupPremium
join:2002-06-07
Coloma, MI | said by satellite68:Perhaps a "wink" or [sarcasm on] would have been appropriate... Ok, here's my take on this issue. You tell me if I've got it right.
The phone companies already have address availability databases. Make them turn their data over to the government, at no charge. Assess heavy penalties or even jail time for inaccurate data. Problem solved!
--
Meet Bill and Karolyn at www.theslowskys.com |
|
| Yeah, that hasn't been going so well:
»www.publicintegrity.org/about/re···?aid=115 |
|
| reply to extreme50
said by extreme50:said by satellite68:Perhaps a "wink" or [sarcasm on] would have been appropriate... Ok, here's my take on this issue. You tell me if I've got it right. The phone companies already have address availability databases. Make them turn their data over to the government, at no charge. Assess heavy penalties or even jail time for inaccurate data. Problem solved! Well, unless the NSA asks for it, it ain't happening... |
|
| reply to extreme50
Gosh, I like this... Do cable companies have this too? Or if it's available in one place in their system, it's available in all place? I mean, they should have this. Good idea! |
|
