n2jtx
join:2001-01-13
Glen Head, NY
 ·Optimum Online
| And Who Will Pay?
"It will also authorize the issuing of grants to help bring service to under-served regions." And just where will that "grant" money come from? Oh I know. They will start taxing MY internet service and up my USF so they can give cheap service to those who do not have it. I just love socialism, especially when I get to pay the bills and not get any benefit.
--
I support the right to keep and arm bears. |
|
karlmarx
join:2006-09-18
iraq
 ·Fairpoint Communic..
| Pay the bills and not get any benefit? WOW, that the kind of statement that fractures society. So by your reasoning, all the poor people should be left to die? I mean, you pay taxes to support your hospital, and they are providing FREE CARE. And in your world, why should we have an interstate highway system? I mean, YOU don't use it, so why should you have to pay for it? And the fire department? YOU haven't had a fire, so why should YOU have to pay for it.
The internet is a NECESSARY utility, if you want to be a productive member of society. The fact that someone choose to live in a 'rural' area shouldn't mean they are second class citizens. The internet is, and should be treated as, a utility. Which means that wherever you choose to live in the US, you should have access to it. It may not be cheap, but at least it should be avialable.
--
Stick it to the MAN. Support your local torrent sites. Proudly providing 100mb of upstream for all your TV, Movie, and MP3 needs. |
|
TheRogueX
join:2003-03-26
Springfield, MO
| reply to n2jtx
Good.
I hope they tax your arrogance too, so you become poor and can't have internet anymore without help.
I just love free-market capitalism, especially how it turns people into greedy, arrogant bastards who treat the have-nots like they're subhuman and thus unworthy of a little help now and then. |
|
jester121
join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL
 ·surpasshosting
 ·ViaTalk
| reply to karlmarx
said by karlmarx  : The internet is, and should be treated as, a utility. Which means that wherever you choose to live in the US, you should have access to it. It may not be cheap, but at least it should be avialable. It is available everywhere. It's called Netzero dial up. And it's cheap!
Or did you mean to say that everyone should have the same high speed internet? That would be more in keeping with your namesake's views.  |
|
jjeffeory
join:2002-12-04
USA
1 edit | reply to n2jtx
Maybe they should take the USF that has ALREADY been used and put it to something it was supposed to be used for... We've already been paying it. Where did this first 10 years of money go? Corporate profits? It certainly didn't raise the speeds to 40 mbps both ways! |
|
jjeffeory
join:2002-12-04
USA | reply to karlmarx
This is spot on. Wow, you guys are all giving great points today! I've agree with something that everyone has written so far. |
|
jjeffeory
join:2002-12-04
USA
| reply to jester121
Everyone should have BROADBAND. Dialup is NOT good enough for today's needs. That's like saying you can have 20 amp service electricity in the country, while you have to have 100 or 200 amp service in the city. It doesn't fit the way all Americans live. |
|
jjeffeory
join:2002-12-04
USA | reply to TheRogueX
An oligopoly is NOT free market. There should be more independent choices available for free market to work. |
|
