site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
219
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Uncle Paul

join:2003-02-04
USA
kudos:1

Again

How do you measure broadband penetration if you can't define broadband?

Would Satallite broadband count?
What about EDGE broadband?
ISDN?
Bonded 56k modems?

Does the word 'latency' show up anywhere?

jjeffeory

join:2002-12-04
USA

1 edit

None of these are broadband in today's world. I think latency should be put into the equation. Also, there needs to be a minimum speed. I propose 3Mbps/512kbps as the bare minimum. And, we should get some of that USF money back from the companies that didn't use it for its "intended" purposes.



arnon

@pacbell.net

reply to Uncle Paul
The FCC currently defines broadband as anything above 200kbps. Recently, the Senate Commerce Committee approved a bill that will require the FCC to redefine the decade old definition. Now, we just wait until Congress passes.
»Congress Realizes Broadband Data Sucks


jjeffeory

join:2002-12-04
USA

200kbps is NOT broadband and the FCC needs to fix that definition. We have to wait on the "nimble" government. Maybe if we call this terrorism and the government will then get right on that?


Tuesday, 29-May 05:14:57 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics