<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Not a threat in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19364791</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:19:39 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:19:39 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Not a threat</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19370398</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1062699"><b>robjulo</b></A> : Directv's new MPEG4 channels are NOT Hd-lite and very close if not as good as OTA HD.  At least know what your talking about before posting.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19370398</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:50:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not a threat</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19368401</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1426138"><b>njcellfreak</b></A> : I've compared OTA, Comcrap and Directv and noticed hardly any differences whatsoever. The new MPEG4 channels looked great to me. Definately not HD-Lite IMO.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19368401</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 01:34:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not a threat</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19367804</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/731512"><b>jjeffeory</b></A> : I've had BOTH. You don't know what you're talking about. You're just copying some jibberish you heard.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19367804</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 23:20:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not a threat</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19367691</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/927242"><b>grydlok</b></A> : Prove the mpeg4 is not full rez.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19367691</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:58:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Not a threat</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19365520</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1274664"><b>robertfl</b></A> : Direct TV is HD LIGHT. I'll take TRUE hd anytime.<br><br>-Rob]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19365520</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:00:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Not a threat</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19364791</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I dont see how this is much of a threat to DirecTV as they will have the capacity for over 150 HD channels after D11 launches in December. They could easily offer any national HD channel the minute they launch.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19364791</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:19:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
