| reply to jtorre69
Re: Thats not right Phone companies used to be forced to open up their networks. There was a lot more competition and differentation of price and service. My experience of course was in Southern California. PacBell/SBC/ATT would sell you one speed at a price, while other cariers would sell DIFFERENT, sometimes higher speeds, for less. It seemed pretty good to me. |
|
| reply to jjeffeory
May be illegal, but not unconstitutional. The Constitution does not establish laws, it limits what the federal government can do. |
|
 QumahlinNever Enough TimePremium,MVM
join:2001-10-05
united state | reply to soup du jour
said by soup du jour:said by majortom1029:So verizon and att can do what ever they want and cable companies cant? That seems a little unfair dont you think? i cant honestly say i agree or disagee - my only thoughts are that comcrap CANNOT be the only option for tv service - that is unconstitutional other than the dish that went out every time it sprinkled i say again - YEA AT&T U-VERSE and BOO to COMCRAP - i will never have cable from them again... NEVER! If you think you not having access to different cable providers is "unconstitutional" then I suggest you re-read the constitution. |
|
