<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: You know what they say... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19370040</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 04:28:32 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 04:28:32 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: You know what they say...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19370784</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/519917"><b>Camelot One</b></A> : "sure he's guilty, he killed those boys. But the jury wants to let him off, and this gives them an out to find him not guilty, even though they know he did it". - John Grisham Novel<br><br>And that's exactly what this argument is. They know they shouldn't be doing it, and they know if they don't give the FCC a way to avoid b*tch slapping them for it, that's exactly what they'll get. But with an overly - extremely - bought and paid for- sympathetic FCC Commissioner, they need only give him a way to justify what they are doing as being consumer friendly. <br><small>--<br>Intel Quad Core QX6700 @3500Mhz/Asus P5N32-E SLI/4x 1024Mb Corsair/WD 74Gb Raptor/PNY 7800GTs SLI/Antec 550 True Control/Custom water cooler</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19370784</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:40:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: You know what they say...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19370387</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><b>en102</b></A> : To ensure any form of network neutrality, Comcast would have to have a site audit.<br><small>--<br>Canada = Hollywood North</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19370387</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:48:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: You know what they say...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19370040</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1173562"><b>MysticGogeta</b></A> : Agreed I hope the FCC does something good for once and force them to stop that shit. Pardon my french but that is the only way to properly describe sand-vine.<br><small>--<br><b><A HREF="/forum/disco">Team Discovery</a></b>-Join the fight</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19370040</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:51:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>You know what they say...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19370026</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/772729"><b>Nerdtalker</b></A> : A rose, by any other name, is still a rose...<br><br>Throttling and blocking seeding of BitTorrent traffic, by any other name, is still throttling and blocking of BitTorrent traffic.<br><br>No semantic argument filled with lofty legalese is going to make this all go away. Depending on what comes of this, it just may define network neutrality, or lack thereof, for years to come. <br><small>--<br>"Some people never see the light till it shines thru bullet holes." -Bruce Cockburn<br><br>I'm testing Gmail's spam filters: Broadbandreports1@gmail.com<br><b>Spam: 12900+</b> messages currently using 406 MB.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19370026</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:49:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
