Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » U-Verse Will Proceed in CT » Good
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Thats not right »
« This was the right thing to have happened....  
AuthorAll Replies

boober321

join:2003-07-15
Milwaukee, WI
·ViaTalk

reply to pnh102
Re: Good

said by pnh102 See Profile :

The costs of these deployments are huge and the only hope for any recovery of that investment is that people purchase these services.
They stifle other enterprises that would offer cheaper and more efficient services. Why is it that other countries like South Korea have vastly superior networks? It's because big telecomm in America drag their feet and stop other others from using innovative technologies. Much like Verizon's lawsuit against Vonage. Extremely over broad patents that should never have been issued, used to stop cheaper solutions from being offered.
And BTW- U-Verse is ANYTHING but cutting edge. They're using the same crap as always except now they have to limit internet speeds to also provide a crappy same as everyone else television product...

said by pnh102 See Profile :

The government is the one telling these companies that they cannot do business.
No, the government is telling then they have to FOLLOW RULES to operate, instead of being given the ability to run rough shot over the customers and local communities.

said by pnh102 See Profile :

So AT&T, or any other company, shouldn't try to see if it can get a more favorable deal with the government? Just because other companies were too lazy to bother doing that, doesn't mean AT&T should be faulted for doing it.
No they shouldn't. They undermine the wishes of the communities they service. The requirements for these companies is often minimal and require they perform at a specified level... I see absolutely no harm in that.

said by pnh102 See Profile :

What responsibilities? If customers do not find U-Verse service favorable, they will not buy it.
What of the people that DO buy it and get the shaft? There is little to no recourse or oversight.

said by pnh102 See Profile :

So how would you solve this? If the judge had not ruled the way he had, no one in CT would have any hope of getting U-Verse. Is that what you want?
Please. They are simply using a scare tactic to get what they want. If there is profits to be made they will be there. Only now, they can cherry pick so only a select few can get a choice. So nice that you so easily abandon your fellow citizens for a half-rate internet/cable selection.
Forums » U-Verse Will Proceed in CTThats not right »
« This was the right thing to have happened....  


Tuesday, 10-Nov 11:33:44 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [89] Verizon Keeps Swinging At AT&T
· [85] VoIP Over 3G Still Not Working For iPhone
· [53] Moto Sold About 100,000 Droids
· [33] Bill Would Force ISPs To Block Financial Scams
· [24] Mediacom Hints At 50, 100 Mbps Speeds
· [17] Clearwire To Get Another $1.5 Billion
· [14] Government Will Release Some Telco Wiretap Lobbying Documents
· [12] Monday Evening Links
· [10] 15 States Have Now Gotten Broadband Mapping Money
· [9] Google Offers Free Holiday Airport Wi-Fi
Most people now reading
· Google Has Acquired Gizmo5 [VOIP Tech Chat]
· A fishy CRTC tarriff filed by bell? [TekSavvy]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Slow speed lately? [TekSavvy]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Live feed of MW2 playing PC version [PC gaming GAMES]
· 60 Minutes piece on cyber security last night [Security]
· [Other] Ooma Outbound Caller ID Not Working [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Best days to buy and sell on AH [World of Warcraft]
· Is Gear Score now the new requirement to get pug invite? [World of Warcraft]