Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » U-Verse Will Proceed in CT » Good
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Thats not right »
« This was the right thing to have happened....  
boober321

join:2003-07-15
Milwaukee, WI
·ViaTalk

Re: Good

said by pnh102 See Profile :

The costs of these deployments are huge and the only hope for any recovery of that investment is that people purchase these services.
They stifle other enterprises that would offer cheaper and more efficient services. Why is it that other countries like South Korea have vastly superior networks? It's because big telecomm in America drag their feet and stop other others from using innovative technologies. Much like Verizon's lawsuit against Vonage. Extremely over broad patents that should never have been issued, used to stop cheaper solutions from being offered.
And BTW- U-Verse is ANYTHING but cutting edge. They're using the same crap as always except now they have to limit internet speeds to also provide a crappy same as everyone else television product...

said by pnh102 See Profile :

The government is the one telling these companies that they cannot do business.
No, the government is telling then they have to FOLLOW RULES to operate, instead of being given the ability to run rough shot over the customers and local communities.

said by pnh102 See Profile :

So AT&T, or any other company, shouldn't try to see if it can get a more favorable deal with the government? Just because other companies were too lazy to bother doing that, doesn't mean AT&T should be faulted for doing it.
No they shouldn't. They undermine the wishes of the communities they service. The requirements for these companies is often minimal and require they perform at a specified level... I see absolutely no harm in that.

said by pnh102 See Profile :

What responsibilities? If customers do not find U-Verse service favorable, they will not buy it.
What of the people that DO buy it and get the shaft? There is little to no recourse or oversight.

said by pnh102 See Profile :

So how would you solve this? If the judge had not ruled the way he had, no one in CT would have any hope of getting U-Verse. Is that what you want?
Please. They are simply using a scare tactic to get what they want. If there is profits to be made they will be there. Only now, they can cherry pick so only a select few can get a choice. So nice that you so easily abandon your fellow citizens for a half-rate internet/cable selection.
Forums » U-Verse Will Proceed in CTThats not right »
« This was the right thing to have happened....  


Thursday, 03-Dec 05:37:27 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [162] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [98] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [80] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [72] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [62] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [55] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [46] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [41] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [40] AT&T, Verizon Drop 3G Ad Dispute
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· [Config] cisco asa 5505 with multiple outside IP addresses [Cisco]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Opening a file download dialog from a JavaScript function. [Webmasters and Developers]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Working in a Stairwell and Surrounding High Walls [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for October 13, 2009 [Security]
· Quality/longevity of 15A 120V receptacles [Home Repair & Improvement]