Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Verizon Changes TOS to Define ‘Unlimited’ » 5 GB not a bad cap for wireless
Uniqs:
1316
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Go ahead and make sport.  

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

5 GB not a bad cap for wireless

I only use 5 GB or less per month on two cable connected PCs and I use the internet all the time. So a 5 GB cap for a wireless connection is more than enough.

It is good to see that they are admitting they have one and justifying having one. Maybe people will finally realize that bandwidth costs money and has to be paid for. Unlimited isn't financially sustainable.
Joe12345678

join:2003-07-22
Des Plaines, IL

Re: 5 GB not a bad cap for wireless

They should also let buy more at Max speed as well not force you to 200 Kbps

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

Re: 5 GB not a bad cap for wireless

said by Joe12345678 See Profile :

They should also let buy more at Max speed as well not force you to 200 Kbps
And they can then use the additional income to add more capacity to the cell towers backhaul.

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

Re: 5 GB not a bad cap for wireless

I think they would need more spectrum allocated (big $$). Adding backhaul is per site. Adding spectrum is per MTA/BTA.
--
Canada = Hollywood North

SprintVerizoncom

@sprintlink.net
Go with Sprint unlimited EVDO, they should also be letting you buy just the size of pipe you want when WiMAX is released

tc1uscg

join:2005-03-09
Saint Clair Shores, MI

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

I only use 5 GB or less per month on two cable connected PCs and I use the internet all the time. So a 5 GB cap for a wireless connection is more than enough.

Maybe people will finally realize that bandwidth costs money and has to be paid for. Unlimited isn't financially sustainable.
That's incorrect. Not if the bandwidth is already there. They are like Comcast.. They want to control EVERY corner the customer wants to go. What you want to download and run on your phone and where you get it. There are others, such as Sprint, who can/has/does sustain unlimited bandwidth for it's users and have since vision came out onto market. If you think (and VZW) their network can't handle the bandwidth, then it's no wonder it takes so many people to keep it up and running. Proof is in the pudding I like to say. You gauge the network and it's use by percent of blocking (no bandwidth to handle the call(s)). Gotta wonder if VZW has a larger blockage per cell then any other carrier so they feel the need to hold people back.. What I see through the smoke screen is they know their network can't handle the load. Unlike AT&T, Sprint and others. JMO..

rit56

join:2000-12-01
New York, NY

Re: 5 GB not a bad cap for wireless

HCT is an employee of Verizon or a similar providor. Check out his posts. 5 GB is bullsh** and you are right about they wanting to control everything.

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

Re: 5 GB not a bad cap for wireless

said by rit56 See Profile :

HCT is an employee of Verizon or a similar providor. Check out his posts. 5 GB is bullsh** and you are right about they wanting to control everything.
No I am not. You post these nonsense claims because you don't have the ability to debate the issues. I feel sorry for you.

r81984
Fair and Balanced
Premium
join:2001-11-14
St John'S, NL
·magicjack.com
·Cox HSI
·Insight Communicat..
·AT&T Midwest

Re: 5 GB not a bad cap for wireless

HCT,
The reason they make these claims is because you are either a grandma that uses the internet for email or you work for Verizon.

Which one is it?

You have to be stupid to think they can redefine unlimited to 5GB a month.
5GB a day would be sort of OK, but 5GB a month is insane and makes the service pointless.
--
»www.ryanoneill.us

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

Re: 5 GB not a bad cap for wireless

said by r81984 See Profile :

HCT,
The reason they make these claims is because you are either a grandma that uses the internet for email or you work for Verizon.

Which one is it?
Neither. I don't live in the either/or black/white world you apparently live in.
said by r81984 See Profile :

You have to be stupid to think they can redefine unlimited to 5GB a month.
5GB a day would be sort of OK, but 5GB a month is insane and makes the service pointless.
It isn't pointless for the vast majority of users. 5 GB/month will usually satisfy 95% of the users.
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page

r81984
Fair and Balanced
Premium
join:2001-11-14
St John'S, NL
·magicjack.com
·Cox HSI
·Insight Communicat..
·AT&T Midwest

Re: 5 GB not a bad cap for wireless

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

It isn't pointless for the vast majority of users. 5 GB/month will usually satisfy 95% of the users.
Well thats your opinion.
In my opinion, it will piss off 95% of the users.
--
»www.ryanoneill.us

tc1uscg

join:2005-03-09
Saint Clair Shores, MI


1 edit

Re: 5 GB not a bad cap for wireless

Common fellas, HCT can have his/her opinion. I've been accused of working for Sprint, comcast, and other providers people love to hate, MANY times (because I'm always for the underdog I guess..) but I keep posting anyway.. If HCT works or contracts for any telecom, he can favor whoever he wants. That's what makes these forums so colorful.
tcapun

join:2007-11-09
Arcadia, CA
"5 GB/month will usually satisfy 95% of the users."

Logic FIRST. If 95% use less than 5GB, why cap the other 5%?
Most likely that percentage is fictional, HCT.

pump and dump

@verizon.net

I am disabled and started using our local library audio book download service. 1 book = 1 gig or more, with my wife and I both using the download service we are now screwed.

Look at all the flash and other commercial trash they are loading up on commercial sites.....squeeze that penny you bastards.
nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD

1 edit
oops. didn't realize we were talking wireless - never mind.

Pyrion
Liquid Metal Nanomorph

join:2001-12-01
Poway, CA
clubs:
Or they can just switch to Sprint and actually get "unlimited."
Forums » Verizon Changes TOS to Define ‘Unlimited’« Go ahead and make sport.  


Monday, 30-Nov 03:19:29 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [124] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [82] Weekend Open Thread
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [79] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [63] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [41] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
Most people now reading
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· Netgear WNDR3700 [Comcast HSI]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Grey Cup on the Web? [Canadian Chat]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Extjs grid combo box. [Webmasters and Developers]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]