 ThrowDemsOutIf you can't convince 'em, confuse 'emPremium
join:2002-03-03
Mullica Hill, NJ
kudos:4 | reply to r81984
Re: 5 GB not a bad cap for wireless said by r81984:HCT, The reason they make these claims is because you are either a grandma that uses the internet for email or you work for Verizon. Which one is it? Neither. I don't live in the either/or black/white world you apparently live in.
said by r81984:You have to be stupid to think they can redefine unlimited to 5GB a month. 5GB a day would be sort of OK, but 5GB a month is insane and makes the service pointless. It isn't pointless for the vast majority of users. 5 GB/month will usually satisfy 95% of the users.
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page
|
|
 r81984Fair and BalancedPremium
join:2001-11-14
Katy, TX
 ·AT&T U-Verse
 ·AT&T DSL Service
 ·row44
| said by ThrowDemsOut:It isn't pointless for the vast majority of users. 5 GB/month will usually satisfy 95% of the users. Well thats your opinion.
In my opinion, it will piss off 95% of the users.
--
»www.ryanoneill.us |
|
 tc1uscg
join:2005-03-09
Saint Clair Shores, MI
1 edit | Common fellas, HCT can have his/her opinion. I've been accused of working for Sprint, comcast, and other providers people love to hate, MANY times (because I'm always for the underdog I guess..) but I keep posting anyway.. If HCT works or contracts for any telecom, he can favor whoever he wants. That's what makes these forums so colorful.  |
|
tcapun
join:2007-11-09
Arcadia, CA | reply to ThrowDemsOut
"5 GB/month will usually satisfy 95% of the users."
Logic FIRST. If 95% use less than 5GB, why cap the other 5%?
Most likely that percentage is fictional, HCT. |
|
