how-to block ads
|
bgetchel
join:2000-07-05
Waterbury, CT
 ·Charter Pipeline
| reply to DHRacer
Re: Charter and its cruel joke...
Hi DH,
That's a very reasonable question. The answer is two-fold.
First, I get the advertised speed about 20% of the time. It comes in handy when they are able to actually deliver, like on an 8GB download a couple of nights ago. Second, I'm really a closet optimist masquerading as a pessimist. I would LOVE to see Charter get their act together and deliver on their promise (and what I'm paying for).
--
Da Biff | |
rradina
join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO
| That plan didn't work out well for folks that still buy American cars. It's been 30 years and American car companies still lag imports. Recently, only GM actually experienced a sales increase. Meanwhile Toyota is set to overtake Ford as the #2 auto producer in America.
I also use Charter. I get good service even though I believe it's too expensive due to lack of competition. SBC (now AT&T) put DSL in area COs back in 1998 but since then they have done nothing to increase coverage. If you don't qualify for DSL, Charter is the only choice. I believe Charter's prices reflect a lack of competition.
I would jump on 768/128 for $14.99/month or 1.5/256 for $25/month. I'd also go back to satellite in a heartbeat and save a ton of money.
Maybe someday the free-market will grant me a choice. I'm really hoping WiMax becomes all that is promised. From what I've seen, however, the prices are rather expensive considering there is no plant to maintain. Shouldn't it be cheaper to erect a few dozen towers and not have to maintain a fiber/coax/copper plant? For that matter, why can't WiMax use existing cell towers and the existing backhaul? If WiMax works, it seems like it could be implemented quickly, cheaply and provide a real choice to those with no HSI or those with only one choice. | |
|
