Lumberjack
Premium
join:2003-01-18
Newport News, VA
| Shareware for music?
Why not charged a fixed price like a user suggested above at the "sweet spot" but also provide a free ablum that only has half of each song. This is more or less how most shareware works in software land and I think people are more in-tuned to accepting software shareware/licensing than the music industry buy it vs. try it.
--
»www.fairtax.org |
|
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
| Why not let the artist, who owns the music, simply decide how they want to offer their product on their own rather than sitting here discussing this like it's some sort of group decision?
--
"Complaining is the least path of resistance for the self-serving, the lazy, and I’m told it’s a woman’s prerogative..." |
|
Lumberjack
Premium
join:2003-01-18
Newport News, VA
| Because the purpose of the forum is to have group discussions.
I don't think anybody here is trying to create laws for artists to abide by. Instead we are kicking ideas around that we'd like to see as consumers. The artists can still do what they want, but that doesn't mean we can't talk about it.
--
»www.fairtax.org |
|
djrobx
join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
 ·PHONE POWER
 ·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
 ·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to fiberguy
quote:
Why not let the artist, who owns the music, simply decide how they want to offer their product on their own rather than sitting here discussing this like it's some sort of group decision?
Why not let the customer, who potentially might buy the music, simply share his or her thoughts on what would give them the most incentive to buy? |
|
