<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Question about ISDN/ISUP interworking in Q.699 in ISDN</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19399689</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:32:09 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:32:09 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Question about ISDN/ISUP interworking in Q.699</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19399689</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Hi!<br><br>I have a question about ISDN/ISUP interworking - q.699.<br> <br>in section "3.1.1.3    Sending of the Address Complete Message (ACM)", it has:<br><br>c)    En bloc receiving is used on the DSS 1 side and a Progress indicator information element (except with value No. 8, in-band information or an appropriate pattern is now available, No. 3, originating address is non-ISDN, or No. 4, call has returned to the ISDN) is received in a CALL PROCEEDING message or in a PROGRESS message.<br><br>Why these 'exceptions'? especially for the PI=8 in call proceeding case?<br><br>thanks,<br>ancientmoon]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19399689</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 12:34:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
