<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities in Embarq</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19405161</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:00:25 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 07:00:25 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19447787</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/715380"><b>Maxo</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  NormanS <A HREF="/useremail/u/314530"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Your first lookup queries your router, or modem? That would hold the actual Embarq DNS servers, yes? What would interest me would be the results of looking up 'www.microsoft.con' using the Embarq DNS servers. Should be something like this:</div>I have a 2-Wire modem/router combo.  The router is holding the DNS servers (they are set to automatically obtain.)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19447787</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:42:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19447206</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/373609"><b>espaeth</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  NormanS <A HREF="/useremail/u/314530"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Ultimately, what I don't like about OpenDNS is that the Google lookup suggests an OpenDNS landing page for the Google site.<br><br>I am not sure why they do that. I don't know why I should trust OpenDNS more than Google.</div>Google cuts OpenDNS in on the AdWords revenue, which is how they are able to provide the service for free.  Google needs some way to track who is using OpenDNS to get to their site to properly attribute the AdWords revenue payout for sponsored link clicks, so that's why you get directed to the OpenDNS navigation page first so that the OpenDNS referral can be tracked.<br><br>You get the same Google content and search results, the only thing that changes is who gets paid if you click on a sponsored link.<br><br>-Eric]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19447206</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 03:14:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19447188</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/373609"><b>espaeth</b></A> : I ran through some of the DNS servers listed in the FAQ, it appears all of the Flordia servers are doing the mistype redirection, but once you go further down the list the results are hit and miss.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19447188</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 02:57:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19447174</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/314530"><b>NormanS</b></A> : I was just trying to find out what the Embarq DNS servers were really doing. I don't use them myself, and don't know if I could test them myself. At least on ISP blocks access to their DNS servers from outside of their customer network IP address space.<br><small>--<br>Norman<br>~Oh Lord, why have you come<br>~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19447174</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 02:48:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19447143</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1502588"><b>dagman52</b></A> : <br>agreed. Perhaps we are arguing the same thing. ;-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19447143</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 02:27:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19447138</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/314530"><b>NormanS</b></A> : I didn't post a single screen shot. All are "copy and paste" jobs; plain text.<br><br>If an 'nslookup' on a non-existent domain does not return an IP address to a landing page, then there is no problem that I can see.<br><small>--<br>Norman<br>~Oh Lord, why have you come<br>~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19447138</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 02:26:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19446999</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1502588"><b>dagman52</b></A> : <br>Norman,<br>   I didn't take screenshots, but nslookup is responding correctly when I'm opted out of the service (using Linux). Opting back in is overriding the queries on a known typo. I would go so far to say as Embarq's DNS servers are working as I would expect.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19446999</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:14:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19446870</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/314530"><b>NormanS</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Maxo <A HREF="/useremail/u/715380"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Mind you, this is on Linux:<br> </div>As long as the results make sense...<br><br>Your first lookup queries your router, or modem? That would hold the actual Embarq DNS servers, yes? What would interest me would be the results of looking up 'www.microsoft.con' using the Embarq DNS servers. Should be something like this:<br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>C:\Documents and Settings\Norman&gt;nslookup www.microsoft.con&#012;*** Can't find server name for address 192.168.0.1: Non-existent domain&#012;*** Default servers are not available&#012;Server:  UnKnown&#012;Address:  192.168.0.1&#012; &#012;*** UnKnown can't find www.microsoft.con: Non-existent domain&#012;</textarea><!--end code block-->I have actually been jumping around, trying different setting in my router. I ran with the default DHCP setting (router gets IP address, DNS servers from SpeedStream 4100) for a long time. Every so often, though, I'd hit a period of DNS lag. I thought it might be the router firmware, and tried both the latest version, and the first (router shipped with the middle version, of three). Ultimately figured it might be some kind of interaction between the router and the modem, so I manually overrode the automatic settings. I also played with OpenDNS (set up an account to configure things) and Verizon DNS server on the router. Ultimately, what I don't like about OpenDNS is that the Google lookup suggests an OpenDNS landing page for the Google site:<br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>C:\Documents and Settings\Norman&gt;nslookup www.google.com&#012;Server:  resolver1.opendns.com&#012;Address:  208.67.222.222&#012; &#012;Non-authoritative answer:&#012;Name:    google.navigation.opendns.com&#012;Addresses:  208.67.219.230, 208.67.219.231&#012;Aliases:  www.google.com&#012;</textarea><!--end code block-->I am not sure why they do that. I don't know why I should trust OpenDNS more than Google.<br><br>Anyway, I'd rather keep the ATTIS DNS servers, for now (68.94.156.1/68.94.157.1). If 'at&t Yahoo!HSI' (ATTIS) changes things, I would consider jumping over to DSL Extreme for Internet service. As long as DSLX kept a basic, no-frills, no tricks DNS service. Or run with <A HREF="https://www.dyndns.com/services/dns/recursivedns/">Dynamic DNS Network Services, LLC "Recursive DNS"</a> service, if necessary. Granted, I'd have to pay for it. But it would be exactly what DNS should be.<br><br><small>--<br>Norman<br>~Oh Lord, why have you come<br>~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19446870</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:36:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19446614</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/373609"><b>espaeth</b></A> : It's in the control panel after you register your IP address.<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/19446614?c=1240580&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxOTQwNTE2MS54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="90005 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=433 SRC="/r0/download/1240580.thumb600~13e8a47c090dbee1c447832aaff36744/opendns.jpg/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A><br>OpenDNS Control Panel</TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19446614</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 23:45:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19446468</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/314530"><b>NormanS</b></A> : The place to disable OpenDNS error correction. There is a bit of lag from when I change the router to use their DNS servers, and when their Dashboard reflects that change. And I want to be sure that the change is in effect before I run the 'nslookup' command, just so I am certain that the results reflect the changes.<br><small>--<br>Norman<br>~Oh Lord, why have you come<br>~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19446468</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 23:16:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19446452</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1502588"><b>dagman52</b></A> : Haven't found what?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19446452</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 23:14:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19446333</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/314530"><b>NormanS</b></A> : I haven't found it. Yet. Well, maybe I did. It sort of works:<br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>C:\Documents and Settings\User&gt;nslookup www.google.con&#012;Server:  resolver1.opendns.com&#012;Address:  208.67.222.222&#012; &#012;*** resolver1.opendns.com can't find www.google.con: Non-existent domain&#012;</textarea><!--end code block-->Which is satisfactory, from the standpoint of getting a proper error when a domain doesn't exist. OTOH...<br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>C:\Documents and Settings\User&gt;nslookup www.google.com&#012;Server:  resolver1.opendns.com&#012;Address:  208.67.222.222&#012; &#012;Non-authoritative answer:&#012;Name:    google.navigation.opendns.com&#012;Addresses:  208.67.219.230, 208.67.219.231&#012;Aliases:  www.google.com&#012;</textarea><!--end code block-->From the standpoint of going straight to the source, it still resolves an OpenDNS IP address, instead of the source IP address. Or am I reading that result wrong? When compared with:<br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>C:\Documents and Settings\User&gt;nslookup www.google.com&#012;*** Can't find server name for address 192.168.0.1: Non-existent domain&#012;*** Default servers are not available&#012;Server:  UnKnown&#012;Address:  192.168.0.1&#012; &#012;Non-authoritative answer:&#012;Name:    www.l.google.com&#012;Addresses:  74.125.19.104, 74.125.19.103, 74.125.19.147, 74.125.19.99&#012;Aliases:  www.google.com&#012;</textarea><!--end code block-->When I go somewhere, I'd like to get the data from the horse' mouth, so to speak...<br>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19446333</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:54:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19446073</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/373609"><b>espaeth</b></A> : FYI -- you can also disable OpenDNS's error correction service if you register with them. (No cost)<br><br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>; &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; DiG 9.3.3rc2 &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; www.microsoft.con @208.67.222.222&#012;; (1 server found)&#012;;; global options:  printcmd&#012;;; Got answer:&#012;;; -&gt;&gt;HEADER&lt;&lt;- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 26917&#012;;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0&#012; &#012;;; QUESTION SECTION:&#012;;www.microsoft.con.             IN      A&#012; &#012;;; Query time: 66 msec&#012;;; SERVER: 208.67.222.222#53(208.67.222.222)&#012;;; WHEN: Wed Nov 14 21:16:00 2007&#012;;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 35&#012;</textarea><!--end code block-->]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19446073</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:17:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19444332</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/715380"><b>Maxo</b></A> : Mind you, this is on Linux:<br><br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>david@david-desktop:~$ nslookup www.microsoft.com&#012;Server:         192.168.1.254&#012;Address:        192.168.1.254#53&#012; &#012;Non-authoritative answer:&#012;www.microsoft.com       canonical name = toggle.www.ms.akadns.net.&#012;toggle.www.ms.akadns.net        canonical name = g.www.ms.akadns.net.&#012;g.www.ms.akadns.net     canonical name = lb1.www.ms.akadns.net.&#012;Name:   lb1.www.ms.akadns.net&#012;Address: 207.46.19.190&#012;Name:   lb1.www.ms.akadns.net&#012;Address: 207.46.193.254&#012;Name:   lb1.www.ms.akadns.net&#012;Address: 207.46.19.254&#012;Name:   lb1.www.ms.akadns.net&#012;Address: 207.46.192.254&#012;</textarea><!--end code block--><br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>david@david-desktop:~$ nslookup www.microsoft.con 208.67.222.222&#012;Server:         208.67.222.222&#012;Address:        208.67.222.222#53&#012; &#012;Non-authoritative answer:&#012;Name:   www.microsoft.con&#012;Address: 208.69.32.130&#012;</textarea><!--end code block--><br><small>--<br>"Padre, nobody said war was fun now bowl!" - Sherman T Potter<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.cafepress.com/maxolasersquad" >www.cafepress.com/maxolasersquad</A><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://maxolasersquad.com/" >maxolasersquad.com/</A><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://maxolasersquad.com/network/" >maxolasersquad.com/network/</A> My DSL Network Guide<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://myspace.com/mlsquad" >myspace.com/mlsquad</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19444332</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:34:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19444206</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1502588"><b>dagman52</b></A> : Features and Benefits<br><br>    * Per-user preferences that function independent of cookies and dynamic IP addresses for opt-out and opt-in - improves subscriber experience with holistic preferences and controls integrated into the &#147;My Account&#148; experience<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www2.simplicita.com/product_nxd.html" >www2.simplicita.com/product_nxd.html</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19444206</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:12:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19443731</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/715380"><b>Maxo</b></A> : If I remember when I get home tonight I'll do that.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19443731</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:40:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19443641</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/683237"><b>MrMoody</b></A> : Hmm, seems I was wrong. Opting out (of both options presented) returns:<br><br>Server:  unknown<br>Address:  192.168.1.1<br><br>*** unknown can't find www.typo.con: Non-existent domain<br><br>And fixes the search from address bar. The DNS addresses did not change. Apparently the DNS server is checking accounts before returning results.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19443641</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:27:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19443621</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/314530"><b>NormanS</b></A> : May I suggest that you try using 'nslookup' from a command prompt? I don't have the Embarq DNS server IP addresses (and even if I did, Embarq may obstruct access from outside of their IP network). But I can see the difference between using an error correcting DNS server and a straight, unadulterated DNS server.<br><br>Standard DNS (provided by my ISP):<br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>C:\Documents and Settings\User&gt;nslookup www.microsoft.con&#012;Server:  dnsr1.sbcglobal.net&#012;Address:  68.94.156.1&#012; &#012;*** dnsr1.sbcglobal.net can't find www.microsoft.con: Non-existent domain&#012;</textarea><!--end code block-->Some utilities depend upon that error to function correctly.<br><br>Error-correcting DNS (using OpenDNS):<br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>C:\Documents and Settings\User&gt;nslookup www.microsoft.con 208.67.222.222&#012;Server:  resolver1.opendns.com&#012;Address:  208.67.222.222&#012; &#012;Non-authoritative answer:&#012;Name:    www.microsoft.con.aosake.net&#012;Address:  208.67.219.130&#012;</textarea><!--end code block-->Those utilities which depend upon an error to function properly will fail to function with this result.<br><br>If you opt out of Embarq's DNS error corrections, will you get the first result, or the second when you run 'nslookup' from a command prompt. Try it and post your results. I am curious.<br><br><small>--<br>Norman<br>~Oh Lord, why have you come<br>~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19443621</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:24:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19443615</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/715380"><b>Maxo</b></A> : I didn't realise that.  Thanks for the clarification.  I rarely mistype URLs.  I usually start typing them and then complete it from the address bars history.  I'll have to mistype a URL when I get home to watch it in action.<br><strike>I don't think it will have a problem tracking who has opted out, as the DSLAM does do background PPPoE with the Redback, that the user never sees, and this can easily be stored in their LDAP server, or whatever Embarq uses to store information on it's customers.</strike> I may be wrong on this point since this is a DNS level "feature."  I wonder if they have their DNS servers talking to whatever servers store the customers profile.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19443615</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:23:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19443531</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/683237"><b>MrMoody</b></A> : <strike>That's not the same as having a DNS server that returns an error indication when there's no such domain. Opting out just gives you a different result page with error text instead of search results.</strike> A nonexistent domain now returns the IP address of a server at customers.simplicita.com <strike>whether you opt out or not. The server checks your opt-out status (presumably by your IP address - I wonder how well it keeps up with dynamic IPs), then if you're opted out returns an error page, or if not, a search results page.</strike> Your local application has no way of knowing if the domain was invalid - all queries return an IP address.<br><br>I meant the option of separate, unadulterated DNS servers for customers to use.<br><br>Edit: Simplicita is owned by Sandvine, ugh.<br><br>Edit 2: Opting out unadulterates the DNS server.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19443531</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:08:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19443429</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/715380"><b>Maxo</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  MrMoody <A HREF="/useremail/u/683237"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>It would be nice if Embarq would provide this as an option.</div>When you get redirected to Embarq's search there should be an opt-out button.  There was for me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19443429</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:50:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19443351</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/683237"><b>MrMoody</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by gg23 :</small><br><br>the address bar search will not work.</div>That's because it relies on getting a real "domain not found" error from DNS instead of just another Embarq page that LOOKS like one. The only way to fix it is switch DNS to an unadulterated server. It would be nice if Embarq would provide this as an option.<br><br>Savvy users can run their own local DNS server if they have a machine that's always on. I've done this in the past when Time Warner's DNS servers were constantly bogged down or screwed up. It makes browsing faster, too.<br><small>--<br>"It is a future in which globalization really does work ... and everybody winds up getting to be part of the third world." - William Gibson</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19443351</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:36:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19439722</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Just spent 40 minutes on phone with Embarq support. Ralph did not know anything about issue of address bar search failure. He spoke with Techs that are just as uninformed or will not admit they are the problem. I did Optout and my searches immediately changed from going to Embarqs Search page to "The page cannot be displayed" page, but the address bar search will not work.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19439722</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:26:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19437107</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/715380"><b>Maxo</b></A> : I had the same thing happen to me a few weeks ago.  There was an opt-out option, which I selected.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19437107</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:16:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19431363</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Sounds like you have a toolbar or something else controlling browser behavior.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19431363</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:34:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19413104</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Bastages!   It just happened to me as well.  I opted out but now I'm getting redirected to &raquo;<A HREF="http://domainhelp.search.com" >domainhelp.search.com</A>.<br><br>Anyone seen this before?<br><br>Also, I should note this only happens when I'm using IE.  If I use my Firefox browser it's not a problem.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19413104</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 14:34:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19407833</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/683237"><b>MrMoody</b></A> : I just noticed this happened a few days ago. While I'm against this sort of thing in principle, it really doesn't bother me too much in this case. If it keeps my bill down and funds expansion, so be it. Just don't get the idea you can start doing more invasive tinkering.<br><small>--<br>"It is a future in which globalization really does work ... and everybody winds up getting to be part of the third world." - William Gibson</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19407833</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:51:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19406025</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/377086"><b>orph4824</b></A> : Sounds like you didn't release and renew you pc's ip/dns after you set the info in your router.<br>click Start<br>then Run<br>enter cmd then click ok<br>type the following seperately<br><br> ipconfig /release<br> ipconfig /renew<br><br>That will pull a fresh ip and dns from your router, then you should no longer see Embarq's, OpenDNS has thier own mistyped url redirect also but you can opt out of it easily enough, you can even create shortcuts so for instance "dslr" can redirect you to the full dslr url.<br><small>--<br><i>Life's 3 rules: 1. Stuff happens  2. Stuff happens on a regular basis  3. Better get used to the first two... (not the actual saying but you get the drift)</i></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19406025</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 11:51:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19405972</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1501351"><b>pcbill941</b></A> : I looked at OpenDNS and put their IP's into my router and ended up right back at search.embarq.com/index.php when I entered a non URL in the address bar.<br><br>Bill]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19405972</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 11:41:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19405459</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1051719"><b>bctrainers</b></A> : I've been using OpenDNS for the past months now. No need to worry about the DNS Search hijacking anymore. (Unless they begin to force redirect IP's within the network!)  :o]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19405459</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 10:23:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19405447</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/377086"><b>orph4824</b></A> : Haven't noticed this behavior, however I don't rely on Embarq's DNS either so that could be the reason.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19405447</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 10:22:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>EMBARQ Hijacks Browser Search Capabilities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19405161</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1501351"><b>pcbill941</b></A> : As of  this morning, 11/08 here in Florida, Embarq has hijacked a persons ability to search from the address bar in Internet Explorer. They automatically re-direct you to &raquo;<A HREF="http://search.embarq.com/index.php" >search.embarq.com/index.php</A>. One has the option to opt out of &#147;EMBARQ's non-existing domain landing service&#148;, funny how one never opts into these things, but when you do you are left without being able to search from the address bar at all. Basically they have their servers from looking up the DNS for &raquo;<A HREF="http://auto.search.msn.com" >auto.search.msn.com</A><br><br>This looks primarily as a way to shove advertising down customers throats. But I ask what&#146;s next from ISP&#146;s? Will they decide what we can and can&#146;t view on the Internet?<br><br>Bill]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19405161</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 09:27:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
