Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Here Comes The Network Neutrality Squad! » Let's call a spade a spade here
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Great Idea.  
AuthorAll Replies

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

reply to RainWind
Re: Let's call a spade a spade here

said by RainWind See Profile :

I grew up in a very rural area where it wasn't uncommon to see Amish people. They live just fine without utilities.
You're preaching to the choir...I grew up in southeast IA.
said by RainWind See Profile :

I do all my banking and shopping on the internet. I leave my house to go to work, to grocery shop, to take my fiancee out, and to go to the YMCA. For everything else I use the internet. All my bills are paid online. All my non-food shopping is done online. I even rent my movies online.
How many of those activities require a regulated internet connection? None. Dial-up works just fine for everything you mentioned and dial-up access has survived for decades without regulation. I'm not saying the dial-up access is the answer, but I am saying the regulation isn't necessarily the answer either.
said by RainWind See Profile :

When someone pays for an internet connection it should be just like power and water. No filtering or fiddling with the service.
Be careful what you wish for. Power and water are metered services. Personally, I believe that's a viable option to "control", not regulate, the explosion of internet use.
said by RainWind See Profile :

If the ISP doesn't like bittorrent traffic and heavy use then they shouldn't offer a 7meg connection. 768k is fine for most people.

...

ISPs should charge more for high speed connections or introduce fast capped connections with reasonable caps tailored to casual users.
Sounds good to me, but that's heresy around forums like this.
said by RainWind See Profile :

If heavy users are doing so much damage to their network they need to change the way they do business.
I agree, and that's exactly what we're seeing. The problem is, some users aren't happy with the new business model.


RainWind

join:2000-10-20
Van Wert, OH

reply to openbox9
said by openbox9 See Profile :

said by matrix3D See Profile :

While a car is not considered a utility, by your argument we should have stuck with a horse and buggy since we could "do without" cars before that. Times change and the basic necessities of those times also change.
I did not say "do without". Of course basic necessities change as we mature as a civilization, I just don't think internet access counts as one of those basic necessities....yet.
Perhaps for you it isn't, but for many it is. I grew up in a very rural area where it wasn't uncommon to see Amish people. They live just fine without utilities. Just because some people live without something doesn't mean that for others it isn't a necessity.

I do all my banking and shopping on the internet. I leave my house to go to work, to grocery shop, to take my fiancee out, and to go to the YMCA. For everything else I use the internet. All my bills are paid online. All my non-food shopping is done online. I even rent my movies online.

Fiddling with my connection is much akin to deciding that at 6:00 PM power to my stove will be shut off.

When someone pays for an internet connection it should be just like power and water. No filtering or fiddling with the service. If the ISP doesn't like bittorrent traffic and heavy use then they shouldn't offer a 7meg connection. 768k is fine for most people. Maybe companies should offer slow, cheap internet marketed towards casual users rather than trying to get everyone to subscribe to the highest speed. When anyone tries to get on the slow package the sales reps try to talk them up to the faster one.

ISPs should charge more for high speed connections or introduce fast capped connections with reasonable caps tailored to casual users. If heavy users are doing so much damage to their network they need to change the way they do business. Offering a cheap fast product and then complaining that people use it is silly.
Forums » Here Comes The Network Neutrality Squad!« Great Idea.  


Saturday, 28-Nov 10:54:45 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [122] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [72] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [69] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [54] Weekend Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Using AirMax to provide triple play services? [Wireless Service Providers]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Bell offering 175M service :) [TekSavvy]
· Once infected, Impossible to detect [Security]
· Motion Sickness Solutions? [General Questions]
· Hosts file attributes set to system and hidden [Security]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Backstab vs screws (not which to use) [Home Repair & Improvement]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]