<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: AT&#x26;T != ISP in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19407194</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:20:30 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:20:30 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: AT&#x26;T != ISP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19407194</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/568336"><b>morbo</b></A> : but think of the profit!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19407194</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 15:07:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>AT&#x26;T != ISP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19406911</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/401000"><b>jjoshua</b></A> : AT&T should no longer be considered an ISP or be able to advertise "internet" access if they filter content.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19406911</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:16:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
