<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: DOS? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19408820</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:45:20 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:45:20 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: DOS?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19408820</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1376598"><b>swhx7</b></A> : Yes, and somehow I suspect that if a Comcast customer started forging packets to sabotage someone else's internet connection, it would be against Comcast's rules. Kinda hypocritical.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19408820</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:47:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: DOS?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18991464</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/254200"><b>tao</b></A> : I was wondering about the legality of forging a packet while still having a IP header with the originating users IP address as the sender of said packet. Further, this said packet informs the recipient that the sender wishes to terminate the conversation.<br><br>This clearly is a fraud. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18991464</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 07:52:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>DOS?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18973348</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/487382"><b>dentman42</b></A> : Sandvine forges a packet to cause a dropped connection? Sounds dangerously close to a Denial of Service attack to me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18973348</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:28:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
