<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Satellite vs.ISDN: Personal Experiences in ISDN</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19419563</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:43:48 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:43:48 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Satellite vs.ISDN: Personal Experiences</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19427014</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/837603"><b>fozngoof</b></A> : I have a friend with the Sat connection, and I had ISDN for years.<br><br>Your cost is going to be about 70-100 $$$ per month with ISDN.  You may find better deals, but that is my experience.<br><br>The pings in ISDN are comparable to cable/dsl....  most of the time sub 100 ms (though dsl/cable will normally be lower)  The latency in sat is considerably more. waaaaaaay to much to play any online shooter.  There is a HUGE difference in latency between sat and isdn.<br><br>Most ISDN lines are considered business class, which has special provisions for uptime.  Hence the higher cost.  <br><br>If you have issues with your ISDN connection, they will usually have it resolved in less than an hour (in my experience, though once it took almost 2 because they had to physically change some hardware at the CO.....)  in short the uptime is EXCELLENT in ISDN.<br><br>Sat not so much.<br><br>Equipment you can pick up on Ebay, or from members here.  Usually range from less than $20 to $100 for the equipment.<br><br>Your download and upload will be 128/128.  This is comparable to low end DSL/Cable upload....but no where close to the download.  You will notice web pages loading at about the same speed as a DSL/Cable connection, but your file downloads will not be near as fast.<br><br>It depends on what you want to do with your connection, and how much you want to spend.  In my experience it was worth the extra $$$ to have a fast/reliable internet connection. <br><br>If you like online game DO NOT GET SAT!!!!!<br><br>If you download large files, the increased download speed from sat may be worth it.  (torrents suck with sat BTW)<br><br>hope that helps some<br><br>Foz]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19427014</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 01:09:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Satellite vs.ISDN: Personal Experiences</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19419563</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I'm currently connected via satellite, signed up with HughesNet and considering ISDN, but I have a few questions before I jump blindly in. Satellite could've been a prettier picture overall if I'd bothered to ask around before rushing on. I've been reading up on ISDN, but what I need is something more down to earth; less technical information (though don't be shy) and more personal experience with both satellite and ISDN.<br><br>How do speeds compare? Downloading/uploading?<br><br>Latency is obviously better with ISDN, but is it still noticeable?<br><br>What would I be looking at, if I were to go with ISDN? Equipment, pricing, monthly plans on average.<br><br>Most importantly: reliability. Barring understandable and occasional equipment failures, if I want a connection with ISDN, will I get one? This is the Big Reason I want to move off satellite; I only even have a connection 1/3 of the time.<br><br>Anyone have some experiences on both sides of the fence? Is the grass really greener or just a different shade?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19419563</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:41:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
