Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Other Connectivity » ISDN » Satellite vs.ISDN: Personal Experiences
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


fozngoof
Premium
join:2003-07-08
Temple, TX
·AT&T Southwest

reply to unmachine
Re: Satellite vs.ISDN: Personal Experiences

I have a friend with the Sat connection, and I had ISDN for years.

Your cost is going to be about 70-100 $$$ per month with ISDN. You may find better deals, but that is my experience.

The pings in ISDN are comparable to cable/dsl.... most of the time sub 100 ms (though dsl/cable will normally be lower) The latency in sat is considerably more. waaaaaaay to much to play any online shooter. There is a HUGE difference in latency between sat and isdn.

Most ISDN lines are considered business class, which has special provisions for uptime. Hence the higher cost.

If you have issues with your ISDN connection, they will usually have it resolved in less than an hour (in my experience, though once it took almost 2 because they had to physically change some hardware at the CO.....) in short the uptime is EXCELLENT in ISDN.

Sat not so much.

Equipment you can pick up on Ebay, or from members here. Usually range from less than $20 to $100 for the equipment.

Your download and upload will be 128/128. This is comparable to low end DSL/Cable upload....but no where close to the download. You will notice web pages loading at about the same speed as a DSL/Cable connection, but your file downloads will not be near as fast.

It depends on what you want to do with your connection, and how much you want to spend. In my experience it was worth the extra $$$ to have a fast/reliable internet connection.

If you like online game DO NOT GET SAT!!!!!

If you download large files, the increased download speed from sat may be worth it. (torrents suck with sat BTW)

hope that helps some

Foz
-
Forums » Other Connectivity » ISDN


Wednesday, 20-Aug 19:47:04 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [93] Was FiOS a Good Idea?
· [77] Landscaping, Courtesy of AT&T?
· [70] ISPs Whine About Network Neutrality 'Paranoia'
· [61] FCC Finally Issues Comcast Throttling Order
· [55] Google Launches White Space Broadband Website
· [53] Craig Moffett: Network Upgrades Are For Ninnies
· [52] Qwest, Unions Strike Deal
· [49] Olympics Didn't Cause The Exaflood
· [49] AT&T Cooking Up New VoIP Product
· [44] First Android Phone Gets FCC Approval
Most people now reading
· Unsupported Computer Configuration [AT&T Southeast]
· How I Stole Someone's Identity [Security]
· [XP Home] FAT32 vs NTFS [Microsoft help]
· [iPhone] 2.0.2 firmware is out, Please post outcome [All things Macintosh]
· [Connectivity] Sandvine kills more than just P2P [Comcast HSI]
· Not throttled anymore [TekSavvy]
· MA Realignment [Verizon FIOS TV]
· VoIP and the 911 dilemma [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [Speed] Comcast to throttle individual users; all protocols [Comcast HSI]
· Fios Pro and Cons [Verizon FIOS TV]