site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
3201
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


42246015
I was there on 9-11
Premium
join:2007-04-22
lol

Pipe Bomb = WMD?

Since when are pipes bombs "weapons of mass destruction" ?
--
I was there on 9/11.


rcdailey
Dragoonfly
Premium
join:2005-03-29
Rialto, CA

Other than you, who mentioned WMD?



42246015
I was there on 9-11
Premium
join:2007-04-22
lol

1 edit

said by rcdailey:

Other than you, who mentioned WMD?
Read the article. They are charging the guy with "possession of weapon of mass destruction" or something like that.

edit: not possession, they are charging him with making a "false report" about a weapon of mass destruction


NOYB
St. John 3.16
Premium
join:2005-12-15
Forest Grove, OR
kudos:1

reply to rcdailey

said by rcdailey:

Other than you, who mentioned WMD?
Read the artical before commenting please.



La Luna
Survived Ashraful
Premium
join:2001-07-12
Warwick, NY
kudos:3
Reviews:
·Vonage
·Optimum Online

1 edit

reply to 42246015

said by 42246015:

said by rcdailey:

Other than you, who mentioned WMD?
Read the article. They are charging the guy with "possession of weapon of mass destruction" or something like that.

edit: not possession, they are charging him with making a "false report" about a weapon of mass destruction
Do you know what comma's and the word "or" means?

.....charged with calling in a false report of planting a bomb, explosive or weapon of mass destruction....

He called in a false report of ONE of the above, which all fall under the same charge. It doesn't mean that a pipe bomb = a WMD, in fact, it is distinguishing between them.

Geez....
--
9978 DEADLY TERROR ATTACKS SINCE 9/11~~TEAM DISCOVERY
Can't feel you anymore, don't need you anymore, don't believe you anymore, I don't need you anymore

Austinloop

join:2001-08-19
Austin, TX
kudos:1
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

reply to NOYB
Here is a quote from the article:

"Stranbrough is charged witha false report of planting a bomb, explosive or weapon of mass destruction".

So, it could be a bomb, explosive **or** weapon of mass destruction. I believe that a pipe bomb would qualify.


wvcaver
Premium
join:2005-04-17
Millersburg, OH

so saddam had pipe bombs ! now it makes sense



almex
Premium
join:2001-09-18
Henderson, NV
Reviews:
·CenturyLink

reply to 42246015

said by 42246015:

Since when are pipes bombs "weapons of mass destruction" ?
Since September 11, 2001.

Wednesday, 30-May 02:41:27 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics