  cypherstream Looking forward to the future of things. Premium,MVM join:2004-12-02 Reading, PA clubs: | reply to PolarBear Re: Why so wishy washey?
Well if you move the TV, wouldn't you need to move the outlet anyway? How else would you get live cable TV without a cable outlet? |
|
 BosstonesOwn
join:2002-12-15 Everett, MA clubs:
·Comcast
| said by cypherstream :Well if you move the TV, wouldn't you need to move the outlet anyway? How else would you get live cable TV without a cable outlet? Hence the reason the parent poster wants to use Ethernet. It has so many mediums it can travel over it makes it fairly easy to get any where. -- "It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!" |
|
  PolarBear The bear formerly known as aaron8301 Premium join:2005-01-03 | reply to cypherstream Apparently you aren't understanding the concept of networking; the TV feed would come from the MAIN cable box hooked to the cable line in one room, via networking. We are just discussing WHICH TYPE of networking would work best in this case. |
|
  PolarBear The bear formerly known as aaron8301 Premium join:2005-01-03 | reply to BosstonesOwn Exactly. You said it better than I did. |
|
  Fubar
join:2001-02-20 Phoenix, AZ
| reply to PolarBear said by PolarBear :Apparently you aren't understanding the concept of networking; the TV feed would come from the MAIN cable box hooked to the cable line in one room, via networking. We are just discussing WHICH TYPE of networking would work best in this case. I want to watch more than One channel on my additional TV's |
|
  cypherstream Looking forward to the future of things. Premium,MVM join:2004-12-02 Reading, PA clubs:
| reply to PolarBear Sure you could network recorded DVR content that way, but the client cable box in the bedroom or whatever would also need to be connected to the coax to pull one of the oob data addressing channels (our area uses 104.2 MHz). Without this connection the set top box will not download the guide or turn on features such as DVR or MRDVR.
What your looking for is something more like Slingbox. Comcast is trying to implement this using existing cable boxes with little to no modification (therefore costs less). Plus I'm sure they don't mind sending a tech out to relocate an outlet, they do charge $$ for it after all. |
|
 fiberguy My views are my own. Premium join:2005-05-20
| reply to PolarBear Aaron, you DO realize that each room still gets a cable line for it's own box/live feed, right?... the MRDVR function is ONLY the recorded TV playback and the ability for other sets to 'set a recording'... and that's it.. -- "Complaining is the least path of resistance for the self-serving, the lazy, and Im told its a womans prerogative..." |
|
 fiberguy My views are my own. Premium join:2005-05-20
| reply to Fubar The way you use TV in your other rooms does NOT change. All this does is allows up to 3 existing DCT boxes to tap into the recorded TV option on the DVR.. THAT'S IT!
People are making this into more than what it is.. -- "Complaining is the least path of resistance for the self-serving, the lazy, and Im told its a womans prerogative..." |
|
  PolarBear The bear formerly known as aaron8301 Premium join:2005-01-03
·CableOne
| reply to fiberguy said by fiberguy :Aaron, you DO realize that each room still gets a cable line for it's own box/live feed, right? To do it they way that big cable thinks it should be done, yes. To do it how I think it should be done, a physical line of some sort (coax, ethernet, etc.), but no box on each TV. Like I said before, Dish Network has been doing this for years, using one box to supply two TVs with live AND recorded content.
IMHO, well, read this. |
|
 fiberguy My views are my own. Premium join:2005-05-20
| Yea.. I know that Dish has done it that way... however, those boxes are simply dual tuners and a pain in the butt when trying to do it for more than just two televisions.
First, you'd have to have a box capable of MANY MANY tuners. On a home of 4 rooms alone, you'd need at LEAST a 6 tuner box.. 2 for the DVR and then one for each television. Then, you'd have to have one heck of a system that splits the return frequency back to the dmark where it's pull off the originating line and then fed to the other rooms who then need to all be set to different channels. Truly, NOT a good way to do it. You also have to remember that the path for the control back to the box is an RF remote.. many a times I would have rather chucked the remote through the window when I'd have a hard time getting it to control the box in the other room via radio frequency. At times, I'd be getting up out of bed, walking closer to the door, or simply leaving it open, JUST to get the remote to talk to the box. Not always the greatest in my opinion.
The setup DISH has been using is ok for two tv's, but it's not going to serve the masses efficiently. -- "Complaining is the least path of resistance for the self-serving, the lazy, and Im told its a womans prerogative..." |
|
  codee Premium join:2001-10-01 Minneapolis, MN
| A couple things...
I don't think people are fully understanding how this would work either. you still have STBs wherever you want, and there would just be a "My DVR" type menu on every STB that would connect back to the DVR(S). Having the system work over coax by default is by far the most common sense way to implement this....anybody that has cable by a TV they use already, will have a coax jack there anyways. This system feeds from box to box through splitters, dcs, etc all the way to a block of some form at the point where the drop hits the groundblock. Trying to use ethernet or some varient of ethernet over power, wireless, etc would be much more time consuming and/or costly. not many houses had ethernet jacks in everyroom along with a switch, wireless would be sketchy still, and using ethernet over power would require additional and unnecesary hardware to be purchased.
As far as the Comcast Media Center goes, it is simply a jaw-dropping facility. The provide content and services for many MSOs, NOT just comcast.
I would recommend checking out »www.comcastmediacenter.com
Comcast Media Center (CMC), headquartered in the South Metro area of Denver, is a business unit of Comcast Cable. Under one very big roof, this 350,000 square foot facility provides a total content management solution through its "one source - multiple delivery platforms" capabilities. Its Content Delivery Network offers global transmission via satellite and terrestrial fiber optics, VOD and streaming distribution capabilities. CMC's Content Management Network offers broadcast quality studio, mobile and post production services, origination services for linear TV networks and live events, HDTV production and origination and quality control and media management services, including encoding and storage. Its Affiliate Services Network includes the HITS (Headend in the Sky) digital platform, founded in 1994, and delivers 150 digital services to more than 2,000 cable system headends.
and
This is the HITS, or "Headend in the Sky" system
»www.hits.com
To distribute your video content quickly and in excellent quality, we use a mixture of fiber optic and video circuit connections to transmit and receive information around the earth. Positioned throughout North America, Europe and Asiaand operating worldwideComcast Media Center is well connected over both land and sky. We offer terrestrial connectivity for both full-time and occasional transmissions.
Denver "The Denver Switch" INVESCO Field at Mile High Stadium The Pepsi Arena The University of Denver Magness Arena Digital Media Network Digital Video Services International Video Vyvx Services & Triumph Communications Connectivity between CMC facilities
Los Angeles Verizon Pac Bell Hub
New York Digital Video Services NYC HUB "The Switch" a longtime favorite of U.S. and foreign television networks Waterfront
International connectivity to Sydney, Australia and Athens, Greece
I have a fiber topology map somewhere also, showing all the fiber comcast actually owns, I'll post back if I can find it....its very impressive.
I don't think anybody can look at those systems, and even jokingly say that comcast is behind the times if they actually understand what it is they are doing, and how it's achieved. |
|
 BosstonesOwn
join:2002-12-15 Everett, MA clubs:
·Comcast
| reply to cypherstream said by cypherstream :Sure you could network recorded DVR content that way, but the client cable box in the bedroom or whatever would also need to be connected to the coax to pull one of the oob data addressing channels (our area uses 104.2 MHz). Without this connection the set top box will not download the guide or turn on features such as DVR or MRDVR. What your looking for is something more like Slingbox. Comcast is trying to implement this using existing cable boxes with little to no modification (therefore costs less). Plus I'm sure they don't mind sending a tech out to relocate an outlet, they do charge $$ for it after all. If it uses ethernet over any medium it don't need to tune. It's basically iptv which can carry over anything that can carry an electrical charge really. -- "It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!" |
|