<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Dish Network already does this in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19449330</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:52:10 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:52:10 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Dish Network already does this</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19449330</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1133848"><b>PolarBear</b></A> : Dish network has been doing this since before I started installing them in 2004. The have <A HREF="http://www.satelliteone.com/dish/store/dish622.html">one DVR with basically two receivers built into it</a> (two tuners, two separate outputs for TVs with a separate GUI for each one), so each TV can be operated separately like separate receivers, but both TVs SHARE the one hard drive and it's contents. <br><br>So why not just build on this concept; make one with 4 or 5 tuners and TV outputs. ONE piece of hardware (cheaper per house cost), runs all TVs in the house (makes customers happy).<br><br>The ONLY downfall to this system currently is that it will only run ONE HDTV; the one HDTV connects directly to the box, where all the other "remote" TVs connect via rf-modulated coax. However, if we can transmit SD A/V via <A HREF="http://www.avdeals.com/transmitters/lf30s.htm">one of these, </a>then there is no reason we can't use the same for HD A/V.<br><small>--<br>There comes a point in your life when you get tired of fixing everything and wiping everyone's ass. But it&#146;s not giving up. It&#146;s realizing that you don&#146;t need certain people and the bullshit and drama they bring to your life.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19449330</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:13:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
