http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19451202 en Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:28:04 EDT Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:28:04 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19451352 DaSneaky1D : To further support the point:

»tools.ietf.org/html/bcp60]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19451352 Thu, 15 Nov 2007 18:40:06 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19451202 funchords : Some have taken issue with my use of the word 'Abuse' with regards to Cox and Comcast using the RST flag to tear down TCP connections.

It's an 'abuse' of the specific purpose the RST flag in a packet header.

The RST flag is to be used only by an endpoint in response to a SYN packet when a port is not open, or if an endpoint detects an unrecoverable error condition that requires both endpoints to drop the socket and start over. No intermediate devices should be sending RST and because of this fact it is an abuse of the RST flag.

--Robb Topolski

References: IETF RFC 793, BCP 60
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon USA
Are you affected by Comcast's RST forging? How to test it! -or- Read my original report.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19451202 Thu, 15 Nov 2007 18:16:00 EDT