DSL in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19452040 en Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:57:50 EDT Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:57:50 EDT Re: DSL http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19456493 bogey780 : But most people aren't. Otherwise DSL wouldn't work for so many.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19456493 Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:18:13 EDT Re: DSL http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19454172 dvd536 :
said by bogey780 See Profile :

For Qwest or in general? Because you'd be amazed at how many people are within a mile of their crossbox.
In general. you can live right across the street from your switch and STILL be more than 4K WIRE FEET from it
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19454172 Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:39:06 EDT Re: DSL http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19453633 bogey780 : For Qwest or in general? Because you'd be amazed at how many people are within a mile of their crossbox.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19453633 Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:46:25 EDT Re: DSL http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19452381 en102 : Deploying VRAD's / RT's aren't cheap, and line conditioning needs to be done... As far as TV goes, its a stop gap/temp solution until a better solution (FTTH or FTTH gear becomes cheaper).
--
Canada = Hollywood North]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19452381 Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:11:01 EDT DSL http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19452040 dvd536 : Just needs to die already. there will be very few people who's lines/distances qualify for 25m.
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19452040 Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:21:17 EDT