republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » AT&T May Join Google's Open Phone Coalition » No way in hell they should do this....
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« pthpt  
AuthorAll Replies


Alakar
Facts do not cease to exist when ignored

join:2001-03-23
Milwaukee, WI
·AT&T U-Verse

reply to JasonD
Re: No way in hell they should do this....

You really haven't got a clue.

An open market model similar to this is what has driven Europe's cell phone industry. While carriers do offer subsidized phones for a contract lock in, most people in Europe don't use it. Unlocked cell phone prices are considerably cheaper there than here in the states and the level of innovation in technology and pricing models is way ahead of whats offered here.
--
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom; it is the arguments of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves." William Pitt the Younger

Zoder

join:2002-04-16
Miami, FL

reply to JasonD
said by JasonD :

Yes, thanks for elaborating my point. Plus this 'open innitiative' creates risk for AT&T, Verizon, etc., by placing parts of their business outside of their control. This will only INCREASE costs for all of us.
With that logic, AT&T, Verizon, Comcast, etc... should sell us subsidized computers with our broadband service. Since letting us have computers that run applications outside of their control creates risk for them. Think about how much Comcast could save if they didn't have to buy Sandvine boxes and could just control the computer they sell to you.

Alphy

join:2001-12-31
Troy, MI
reply to JasonD
The risks associated with this occurring are positively hedged by the introduction of new players in the market. Adding a 5th and 6th competitor beyond the Big Four, will do wonders.


openphoneluvr

@spcsdns.net

reply to JasonD
said by JasonD :

Yes, thanks for elaborating my point. Plus this 'open innitiative' creates risk for AT&T, Verizon, etc., by placing parts of their business outside of their control. This will only INCREASE costs for all of us.
Apple put a part of AT&T's business out of their control and it hasn't hurt AT&T.

I like this approach. Service providers need to be just that. Why would I need to have my phone tied to who provides me service? Or, do you like getting your home phones only from "AT&T"?


JasonD

@comcast.net
reply to TKJunkMail
Yes, thanks for elaborating my point. Plus this 'open innitiative' creates risk for AT&T, Verizon, etc., by placing parts of their business outside of their control. This will only INCREASE costs for all of us.
Forums » AT&T May Join Google's Open Phone Coalition« pthpt  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 12:34:46 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [197] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [65] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [63] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [57] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
Most people now reading
· Cross Server Dungeon Experience [World of Warcraft]
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Is sleeping similar to being dead? [General Questions]
· The aftermath [World of Warcraft]
· HOA Headaches [General Questions]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· New PvE Content [World of Warcraft]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]
· CRTC hearing on Monday [TekSavvy]