People Aren't Impressed with AT&T's 3g Launch in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19466716 en Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:33:46 EDT Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:33:46 EDT Re: People Aren't Impressed with AT&T's 3g Launch http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19471354 gaforces :
said by matrix3D See Profile :

Thank you for that uninteresting and uninformative gibberish.
Yo, when the ONT is installed on my house, I will try to be more informative and interesting :) promise]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19471354 Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:03:15 EDT Re: People Aren't Impressed with AT&T's 3g Launch http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19470204 tc1uscg :
said by tcasdorph See Profile :

I don't understand the problem. I've just spent the last month testing both Sprint and AT&T mobile broadband in over six regions/cities and AT&T has never fared any worse than equal to Sprint. In fact, I just returned from two weeks in the Honolulu area, and could not even find a Sprint signal worth working with. The AT&T 3g signal was only present in the Honolulu proper area (airport/West and Diamond head/East), but it made Sprint look sick. Likewise comparisons in areas that are both listed high speed (3G) and otherwise, AT&T matched up quite well. Well enough to return my Sprint PC card and cancel my trial period. I have used the cards also in the SF/Oakland area, Las Vegas, Quad Cities (RI, Davenport, Moline, and Bettendorf), San Antonio, and Washington, DC. Come to think of it, I have also tried it in the Memphis, Chicago, SLC, and Atlanta airports. But let me add this footnote, I'm not overly impressed with any of the mobile broadband (and I've tried Verizon too), its just a means of trying to stay connected. I would not want to work or live with any of the three efforts on a full time basis.
One thing to say..

»www.forumspile.com/Shit-Meter.gif]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19470204 Mon, 19 Nov 2007 00:55:28 EDT Re: People Aren't Impressed with AT&T's 3g Launch http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19467764 matrix3D : Thank you for that uninteresting and uninformative gibberish.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19467764 Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:48:44 EDT Re: People Aren't Impressed with AT&T's 3g Launch http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19466817 gaforces : At&t, initiative, take. The omen of doom is upon you.

Can start with fiber to my house, its right in the street!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19466817 Sun, 18 Nov 2007 13:28:33 EDT People Aren't Impressed with AT&T's 3g Launch http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19466716 tcasdorph : I don't understand the problem. I've just spent the last month testing both Sprint and AT&T mobile broadband in over six regions/cities and AT&T has never fared any worse than equal to Sprint. In fact, I just returned from two weeks in the Honolulu area, and could not even find a Sprint signal worth working with. The AT&T 3g signal was only present in the Honolulu proper area (airport/West and Diamond head/East), but it made Sprint look sick. Likewise comparisons in areas that are both listed high speed (3G) and otherwise, AT&T matched up quite well. Well enough to return my Sprint PC card and cancel my trial period. I have used the cards also in the SF/Oakland area, Las Vegas, Quad Cities (RI, Davenport, Moline, and Bettendorf), San Antonio, and Washington, DC. Come to think of it, I have also tried it in the Memphis, Chicago, SLC, and Atlanta airports. But let me add this footnote, I'm not overly impressed with any of the mobile broadband (and I've tried Verizon too), its just a means of trying to stay connected. I would not want to work or live with any of the three efforts on a full time basis.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19466716 Sun, 18 Nov 2007 13:05:15 EDT