Jwobot
join:2002-08-14
Sterling Heights, MI | reply to dks7
Re: Bottom Line.
I would rather seem them upgrade their video player. Whenever I move the circle to advance in the video, I can never place it where I want it. |
|
ztmike
Mark for moderation
Premium
join:2001-08-02
Michigan City, IN
 ·Comcast
| said by Jwobot  :I would rather seem them upgrade their video player. Whenever I move the circle to advance in the video, I can never place it where I want it. Ditto.
--
"I am the worst president in U.S history, I'm either stupid or dumb most of the time, but people still believe me." George W. Bush |
|
KA3SGM
- -... ...- -
Premium
join:2006-01-17
West Chester, PA
clubs:
 ·Cricket Broadband
 ·Verizon FIOS
| reply to Jwobot
YouTube HD not worth it... YouTube finally SD: Priceless...
Would be nice of them to bring their streaming content up to the 384-512Kbps level, it would make a nice improvement in PQ.
If course the quality of the uploaded source material matters greatly....
Greatly compressed HD streams would probably require at least a 6-10Mbps downstream connection, which is not practical for their service.
--
"Lithium is no longer available on credit" |
|
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| said by KA3SGM :Would be nice of them to bring their streaming content up to the 384-512Kbps level, it would make a nice improvement in PQ. YouTube could make their player have the ability to chose the quality of playback - just like some players do for Yahoo and others. That way they could still satisfy their dial-up and slower broadband users, but allow their fast broadband users to experience the highest quality that the native clip provides.
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page
|
|
BAF
Baffles
Premium
join:2004-02-22
South Glens Falls, NY
clubs: | reply to Jwobot
Re: Bottom Line.
Their embedded player no longer has the option for fullscreen either.
--
BAF - BAFServ.com Webhosting |
|
tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
clubs:
·T-Mobile US
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to KA3SGM
Re: YouTube HD not worth it... YouTube finally SD: Priceless...
said by KA3SGM :Would be nice of them to bring their streaming content up to the 384-512Kbps level, it would make a nice improvement in PQ. If course the quality of the uploaded source material matters greatly.... Greatly compressed HD streams would probably require at least a 6-10Mbps downstream connection, which is not practical for their service. Youtube should adopt some of Winamp's NSV technology. They're able to stream relatively high quality video at pretty low bitrates.
--
|- The LP »www.lp.org/issues/issues.shtml -|
|- Cato @ Liberty »www.cato-at-liberty.org -| |
|
