DotMac
Shill H8r
Premium
join:2007-10-26
Huntington Beach, CA
edit:
November 19th, @11:02AM
| Supply will increase with demand
Supply will simply accelerate. Level 3 and other providers have nothing to gain and everything to lose by reaching capacity. Reaching capacity costs them a lot of money and there is certainly a large opportunity cost. It is in their best interest to keep up with demand. |
|
swhx7
Premium
join:2006-07-23
Elbonia
 ·RoadRunner Cable
| Isn't there excess capacity on the mainlines? That's what I've read. The bottleneck is from the endpoints to the backbones. Residential service in particular needs to get upgraded to fiber.
It's easy to get these dire predictions if you assume demand will continue increasing at the present rate, but also assume that infrastructure will remain the same. But that's not realistic.
The study is contrived to support anti-neutrality political maneuvering. |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
 ·DSL EXTREME
·DSL EXTREME
| Increasing bandwidth by a factor of 2 at the home (per line), would require capacity at the backhaul to increase substantially, if that capacity is not already there.
Items such as sniffing (AT&T's anti-piracy attempt), and throttling (Sandvine - Comcast, COX, and others) are attempts at allowing the Telcos/Cableco's to have their cake and eat it too.
Eg. We'll give you 50Mbps, but you can only download HTML and items through our portal.
If they _really_ want to push that kind of service, they _should_ call it AOL or something else, not 'Internet'.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
