| WTF? OMG! ROFLOL!!! Okay, What I find funny is what they said they need to push:
fiber to the home - so people can be sold faster speeds so the demand more out of the backbone? Not that I am complaining. I'll take highspeed, I'd rather take it mobile
Someone say mobile? what about 4G wireless? Oh yea, isn't sprint/nextel ith another company already working on building out 4G while everyone else on the block is trying to sell people on 3G?
Okay, what about the 'ultimate on go mobile' Sat service? Its a laugh!!!! the pricing is too high and the contention and bandwidth management is... well... don't go to sat service for highspeed unless it is your only hope.
which leaves only one more mentioned to pick fun at. How long has internet over power lines supposed to be coming? how many roadblocks? and really the powerlines are strained enough for power use! now, if you have clean power in your home and want to use power lines in your home to connect computers, that is fine. it will probably be better than wifi as more things use the same frequencies n the future, but any new home should have the wiring done during the building process.
I'd sorry. I have supported wifi and sat service. I haven't supported cell network wifi or power lines... and I have supported the more common dsl and dialup. I have to laugh.
And if you want a really good laugh, how about the big backbones fighting and not passing traffic... not because of lack of bandwidth.... how many years ago is that now???
I am awaiting the rebirth of an aol style network that involve local nets. "here is your nieghborhood / county / state... oh? you want to visit the rest of the world? okay...
I still have hopes for muni wifi |
