site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
702
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Jodokast96
Stupid people really piss me off.
Premium
join:2005-11-23
Erial, NJ
kudos:2

DOCSIS 3.0 Testing Rolls Onward

And FIOS is rolling right on over it.


dmeyer

join:2002-08-14
Austin, TX

Go to the FIOS fanboy forum.

So like 0.0001% of US households can get FIOS. The article is about bringing the remaining 99.9999% of us a better broadband and TV.

From an share holder's standpoint, cable is the way to go. And no I don't own any stock.

bogey780

join:2004-03-19
Here
kudos:1

The assumption you're making is that replacing previous DOCSIS equipment with the new stuff with no other change will allow FTTH-like speeds.

Each new generation of technology requires some massive change. Going to DOCSIS 3.0 will require a lot of work and money so who know how far Verizon or AT&T will be with their overhauls by then.



Cabal
Premium
join:2007-01-21
Austin, TX
Reviews:
·Suddenlink

said by bogey780:

The assumption you're making is that replacing previous DOCSIS equipment with the new stuff with no other change will allow FTTH-like speeds.

Each new generation of technology requires some massive change. Going to DOCSIS 3.0 will require a lot of work and money so who know how far Verizon or AT&T will be with their overhauls by then.
You need to read some of the past DOCSIS 3.0 articles (perhaps those linked above?). You are 100% incorrect.
--
Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?

bogey780

join:2004-03-19
Here
kudos:1

yea yea yea...and BPL only needs to be strapped to a power line.



maartena
Elmo
Premium
join:2002-05-10
Orange, CA
kudos:1
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·DIRECTV

reply to bogey780

said by bogey780:

The assumption you're making is that replacing previous DOCSIS equipment with the new stuff with no other change will allow FTTH-like speeds.

Each new generation of technology requires some massive change. Going to DOCSIS 3.0 will require a lot of work and money so who know how far Verizon or AT&T will be with their overhauls by then.
The difference here is though, that they can upgrade their equipment to the DOCSIS 3.0 standard, without interrupting customers still on a DOCSIS 1.1 or DOCSIS 2.0 modem, AND they can co-exist.

It is not unlikely that cable companies will start to upgrade their head-ends and nodes to 3.0 over the next few years, and maybe offering a FIOS-competitive package (e.g 40/10 or so) while at the same time keeping cheaper, regular cable packages.

DSL/VDSL is limited to distance, and FIOS means someone will have to drop a physical cable to your location. Sure, FIOS and Fiber is the way of the future, but DOCSIS & Cable still have a LOT of life left in them, without having to run new cables to the houses.

And yes, most cable networks are already FTTN, that is how they bring you digital television. Your coaxial loop is most likely less then a mile.

Cable networks will be able to offer a mix-n-match of DOCSIS 1.1, DOCSIS 2.0 and DOCSIS 3.0 modems on their networks. Users having a "lite" package and an old DOCSIS 1.1 modem don't have to change their modem (when it breaks they will simply get a DOCSIS 3.0 one, or even still a DOCSIS 2.0).

With FIOS, once you go fiber, Verizon won't ever put copper back in your building. Makes sense, but it also means that your cheapest internet option is going to be $39.95 ($29.95 for 6 months) and the NEXT person moving in may not need that fast of internet because it is an old lady who checks her e-mail twice a week and visits the knitting club website once a week. Cheap $14.95 DSL is no longer an option, let alone dialup.

From an investors point of view, cable still has the better deal. Its cheaper to deploy, and the current infrastructure (infrastructure is not the same as equipment) hardly has to be changed.
--
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both" -
Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father.


maartena
Elmo
Premium
join:2002-05-10
Orange, CA
kudos:1
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·DIRECTV

reply to bogey780

said by bogey780:

yea yea yea...and BPL only needs to be strapped to a power line.
Essentially, yes. Some equipment needs to be installed on key node points to make BPL possible, but you won't have to run a new powerline to your house as is the case with FIOS and fiber.
--
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both" -
Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father.


extreme50
Formerly TwoKDialup
Premium
join:2002-06-07
Coloma, MI

reply to bogey780

said by bogey780:

...snip... Going to DOCSIS 3.0 will require a lot of work and money so who know how far Verizon or AT&T will be with their overhauls by then.
I live in an AT$T broadband ghetto and still have not seen any Yugo-Verse terminals being installed here. Who knows how far behind AT$T will be when Comcast fires up DOCSIS 3 in Coloma. LOL!!
--
Meet Bill and Karolyn at www.theslowskys.com

bogey780

join:2004-03-19
Here
kudos:1

I really can't predict what AT&T will have in Coloma by the time Comcast deploys 3.0 sometime next decade.



extreme50
Formerly TwoKDialup
Premium
join:2002-06-07
Coloma, MI

said by bogey780:

I really can't predict what AT&T will have in Coloma by the time Comcast deploys 3.0 sometime next decade.
OK, I'll take a crack at it.

Based on T's poor past performance, a reasonable guess would be that T will continue to redline my ghetto neighborhood.

The bottom line is that I'll have DOCSIS 3 long before the slackers at T actually make Yugo-Verse available.

--
Meet Bill and Karolyn at www.theslowskys.com

bogey780

join:2004-03-19
Here
kudos:1

I would bet you on it but by the time it came to collect it would just be a rant over how awful U-verse and AT&T is in general.



vzw emp

@qwest.net

reply to bogey780
As a long time AT&T customer, I can tell you exactly what they will have: the same thing they have right now.


Tuesday, 29-May 18:15:24 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics