DemonChicken
join:2006-10-15
Boon, MI |  reply to stevephl
Yay?
Cell phones already cover most rural areas except for areas where no one NEEDS it. However, Lets take money away from that and give it to rural BB. That would be what I prefer. |
|
zed260
join:2007-09-30
Cleveland, TN | they will probably just take the money from the fund say they are adding more broadband and do nothing but raise rates |
|
DemonChicken
join:2006-10-15
Boon, MI
 ·Alltel Axess
| Probably, I'm to young to fully understand the effects of taxes and the consequences as I don't give 30% of my money to the feds. Nice to know you didn't call me a noobtard though.
So to get this straight this is where some of our tax dollars are being wasted? Like how I saw on the news how they have sent government lawyers to a tropical island to investigate the health of cats? Trying to make the people on the island lock them up every night or something stupid like that because the cats are free roaming even though they are healthy and don't have any viruses.
OK done ranting. |
|
rradina
join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO
 ·Charter Pipeline
| reply to DemonChicken
I call B.S. on rural BB deployment. My parents live in a rural area with no DSL, no cable but they are livin' large with satellite TV and HSI. In fact they have two HSI choices. Both are fixed wireless and reasonably cheap. (One provider is $49/month for 3Mbps/1Mbps and the other is $39/month for 1Mbps/1Mbps).
In fact, they have more choices than I living smack in the middle of the 18th largest metro area!
How do they have these choices? Both local companies that built their own fixed wireless system.
Now why would I want to help fund rural HSI when it seems to be doing fine if we leave it to the capitalist pigs? |
|
DemonChicken
join:2006-10-15
Boon, MI
·Alltel Axess
| rradina good point.
However, I have NO fixed wireless available to me. There is some but its more miles away than DSL/cable and complete CRAP!
America can't even fix itself, we shouldn't try to do any more Iraqs unless were almost positive they have nukes, I'd rather pay more taxes and not have been nuked. |
|
rradina
join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO
·Charter Pipeline
| Do you have cell data plans in your area? I know they aren't cheap and they aren't unlimited but even living in small towns offers advantages that cannot be delivered to truly rural areas. Likewise, the wide open spaces and pin-drop silence of a country house is often cherished by those in crowded suburbia.
But I do understand your point about waste. I would certainly agree that funding rural infrastructure (whatever that might be, broadband, HSI, telephone, water, sewer, electric, etc.) is far smarter than many of our government's past and present policies.
I watched a show on Discovery/TLC/History/NGEO (forget which) about a new station in the Antarctic. I'm sure we spent some serious cash there while folks here in the U.S. do without health care.
Now just so you don't think I'm a bleeding heart liberal (hahaha -- I made myself laugh), I'm not suggesting we reallocate those funds for national health care. I'm suggesting we could cut waste and lower everyone's taxes. Or if we don't lower taxes, perhaps we could pay off our national debt. There are a lot of economists that believe our debt is a big burden on our economy. |
|
BF69
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN
| reply to rradina
said by rradina  :I call B.S. on rural BB deployment. My parents live in a rural area with no DSL, no cable but they are livin' large with satellite TV and HSI. In fact they have two HSI choices. Both are fixed wireless and reasonably cheap. (One provider is $49/month for 3Mbps/1Mbps and the other is $39/month for 1Mbps/1Mbps). Most people's only chocie for "broadband" in the boonies is crappy satelite for $50 a month for 512Kbps no counting the $500 instalation fee. Also the 6-7 GB amonth caps. That's not a REAL choice.
People see broadband as a luxury. At one point electricity and phone service was considered a luxury. In fact that telephone tax that's been charged for 100+ years was originally a LUXURY tax on phone service because if you had a phone you were rich. That sounds crazy now. At one time having a toilet in your house meant you were rich. |
|
DemonChicken
join:2006-10-15
Boon, MI | My god, I don't care if my internet was crap as long as it stays connected and doesnt lag.
I cant stay connected for 5 MINUTES!
THIS SUCKS! Broadband isn't a need but for me internet that at least isn't total CRAP is a need. |
|
DRM Killler
@rr.com
 from:
rradina
| reply to BF69
said by BF69 : At one time having a toilet in your house meant you were rich. It still does. You are not only rich, but too spoiled to realise it as well. |
|
jinjimbob
Troy Mcclure
join:2001-11-13 | reply to DemonChicken
I would like cell phone coverage at my house one day. But its with out it, its the price I pay for living in a great rural place, wouldn't ever live in a city again. ugh. |
|
rradina
join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO
·Charter Pipeline
| reply to DRM Killler
Couldn't have said it better. The only thing we haven't heard yet is that toilets are a RIGHT! Just ask Hillary. I'm sure she'll agree that those without a toilet are disadvantaged and that they should have a right to defecate like everyone else. If elected, she will ensure that everyone gets toilet vouchers funded by taxing the winners in life's lottery. |
|
DemonChicken
join:2006-10-15
Boon, MI
·Alltel Axess
| How about this. INstead of wasting tax dollars on actual BB
Lets get GOOD WIRELESS, low ping high download speed and good reliablility. Thats just as good as anything by my standards. Heck all I want is something with low ping and reliability. |
|
