Re: Sandvine's MSO Case Study-Reasonable Network Management?

Author	All Replies
jbob Reach Out and Touch Someone Premium join:2004-04-26 Little Rock, AR ·Comcast ·AT&T Southwest	reply to telcolackey Re: Sandvine's MSO Case Study-Reasonable Network Management? said by telcolackey : The specific section is as follows: run programs, equipment, or servers from the Premises that provide network content or any other services to anyone outside of your Premises LAN (Local Area Network), also commonly referred to as public services or servers. Examples of prohibited services and servers include, but are not limited to, e-mail, Web hosting, file sharing, and proxy services and servers; I've highlighted what I believe is being interpreted as the ToS elements related to P2P Either way Comcast has shot themselves in the foot by publically stating they do not block P2P or BitTorrent making the whole argument of "file sharing" or even if you choose to go the "Server" route as it applies to BitTorrent a mute point now. By allowing it up till now and making offical public statements to the contrary they have effectively told the public and powers to be that they do not specifically consider P2P or file sharing via BitTorrent as something that is violating the ToS.
	to forum · permalink · · 2007-11-23 18:31:22 · (locked)
telcolackey The Truth? You can't handle the truth join:2007-04-06 Death Valley, CA	said by jbob : Either way Comcast has shot themselves in the foot by publically stating they do not block P2P or BitTorrent making the whole argument of "file sharing" or even if you choose to go the "Server" route as it applies to BitTorrent a mute point now. By allowing it up till now and making offical public statements to the contrary they have effectively told the public and powers to be that they do not specifically consider P2P or file sharing via BitTorrent as something that is violating the ToS. This is another interpretation to fit an agenda. They also say they don't proactively block illegal activity so does that mean they cannot address it if notified?
	to forum · permalink · · 2007-11-23 18:35:24 · (locked)
jbob Reach Out and Touch Someone Premium join:2004-04-26 Little Rock, AR ·Comcast ·AT&T Southwest	said by telcolackey : said by jbob : Either way Comcast has shot themselves in the foot by publically stating they do not block P2P or BitTorrent making the whole argument of "file sharing" or even if you choose to go the "Server" route as it applies to BitTorrent a mute point now. By allowing it up till now and making offical public statements to the contrary they have effectively told the public and powers to be that they do not specifically consider P2P or file sharing via BitTorrent as something that is violating the ToS. This is another interpretation to fit an agenda. They also say they don't proactively block illegal activity so does that mean they cannot address it if notified? Sorry as I have no agenda and have to disagree here. Illegal activity is a well defined subject. The ToS is written in legalese for a reason sometimes making it harder to try and interpret. I understand they way they write these things and do not have an issue. They try and cover all the bases but sometimes allow certain questionable activities to try and please the customer base as long as they do not interrupt the network for others. They can't one minute say they don't block P2P and then turn around and say it's illegal the next. Well they could but that would probably not be the smart thing to do at this point! lol
	to forum · permalink · · 2007-11-23 19:33:51 · (locked)


Tuesday, 24-Nov 23:16:51	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole page compression OFF