site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
923
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


NJxxxJon
DSLR'er from the 56k days.
Premium
join:2005-10-22
00000

Still better

Still better than ATT, T-Mobile and all the others receptonwise around my towns.


Lark3po
Premium
join:2003-08-05
Madison, AL

Better? In my opinion they all suck.



a333
A hot cup of integrals please

join:2007-06-12
Rego Park, NY

About goddam time!!!!!!!! Now if only they could get some balls and remove the cr@ppy 5 gig cap on their overpriced laptop connection card plans................
a333



jgkolt
Premium
join:2004-02-21
Lakewood, OH

reply to NJxxxJon
In my home town, university, and new apartment i get better coverage with tmobile than with att or verizon. Usually verizon gets coverage most places but it doesnt mean they have better coverage in those places than others.


truocchio

join:2004-07-05
Miami Beach, FL

reply to a333
Overpriced in the sense of what your willing to pay? Or overpriced for the most reliable and fastest mobile network speeds available. Maybe you do not understand what it costs to provide services, especially services like mobile access nearly anywhere and everywhere you require. I think 60 or 70 or 80 is a bargain compared to what your option of building your own would be.

You have a choice, use it....or dont. No one if forcing you to buy their service and if you need the convenience and reliability of such a service than paying what its worth is a very good deal.

I am just sick of everyone playing the victim with telco's in highly competitive marketplace (mobile data/wireless). Competition and costs drive the market prices. If they were unreasonable then no one would buy them, since they have one of the largest customer bases I would say pricing is right on point.



huntml

join:2002-01-23
Mullica Hill, NJ

3 edits

said by truocchio :
Or overpriced for the most reliable and fastest mobile network speeds available.
Of course YMMV in cases like this, and VZ might be the best provider where you live/work, but I don't think the statement that VZ's data network is the fastest or most reliable, overall, is borne out by the data. According to EVDOforums.com, Sprint has better coverage and speed, overall.

quote:
Maybe you do not understand what it costs to provide services, especially services like mobile access nearly anywhere and everywhere you require. I think 60 or 70 or 80 is a bargain compared to what your option of building your own would be.
I guess what P. T. Barnum said was true... I pay $15/mo, *and* I don't get capped at 5 GB.

quote:
You have a choice, use it....or dont. No one if forcing you to buy their service and if you need the convenience and reliability of such a service than paying what its worth is a very good deal.

I am just sick of everyone playing the victim with telco's in highly competitive marketplace (mobile data/wireless). Competition and costs drive the market prices. If they were unreasonable then no one would buy them, since they have one of the largest customer bases I would say pricing is right on point.
Then again, people pay premium prices for water bottled in Iceland or Fiji and shipped to the US. Or as they used to say, 'Evian' is 'naive' spelled backwards.

Go figure.

gizmopt2002

join:2004-09-10
Wauconda, IL

reply to NJxxxJon
Around here, and the places I go over the US, verizon sucks, T-mo and AT&T have always been better. My GF and here whole family has Verizon (here and in Iowa), but once their contract is up they are all switching to either AT&T or T-Mo. I takes 5 minutes just to call my GF because the calls never get through to her, it just rings and goes to VM.


matrix3D

join:2006-09-27
Middletown, CT

reply to truocchio
I don't give a damn how good or fast it is. No wireless network is worth $.01/kilobyte or whatever the hell the ridiculous amount is that they charge. There's a difference between paying a premium for a useful service and just plain getting raped for every nickel and dime possible.


matrix3D

join:2006-09-27
Middletown, CT

reply to gizmopt2002
Heh... you sure she's not just ignoring you?


gizmopt2002

join:2004-09-10
Wauconda, IL

haha yea, I've stopped calling her cell, and just call her home. Text messages take 3ish hours to get to her, and she never gets picture messages. This isn't just T-Mo, it's through other providers too.



MysticGogeta
The Robot Devil
Premium
join:2005-03-14
League City, TX

reply to NJxxxJon

said by NJxxxJon:

Still better than ATT, T-Mobile and all the others receptonwise around my towns.
Depends on your area Verizon T-Mobile Sprint have very good coverage in Houston.
--
Team Discovery-Join the fight

Tuesday, 29-May 16:01:30 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics