Re: Still better in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19519805 en Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:09:48 EDT Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:09:48 EDT Re: Still better http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19524385 MysticGogeta :
said by NJxxxJon See Profile :

Still better than ATT, T-Mobile and all the others receptonwise around my towns. :uhh:
Depends on your area Verizon T-Mobile Sprint have very good coverage in Houston.
--
Team Discovery-Join the fight]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19524385 Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:42:42 EDT Re: Still better http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19519941 gizmopt2002 : haha yea, I've stopped calling her cell, and just call her home. Text messages take 3ish hours to get to her, and she never gets picture messages. This isn't just T-Mo, it's through other providers too. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19519941 Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:40:44 EDT Re: Still better http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19519812 matrix3D : Heh... you sure she's not just ignoring you?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19519812 Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:16:11 EDT Re: Still better http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19519805 matrix3D : I don't give a damn how good or fast it is. No wireless network is worth $.01/kilobyte or whatever the hell the ridiculous amount is that they charge. There's a difference between paying a premium for a useful service and just plain getting raped for every nickel and dime possible.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19519805 Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:15:01 EDT Re: Still better http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19519579 gizmopt2002 : Around here, and the places I go over the US, verizon sucks, T-mo and AT&T have always been better. My GF and here whole family has Verizon (here and in Iowa), but once their contract is up they are all switching to either AT&T or T-Mo. I takes 5 minutes just to call my GF because the calls never get through to her, it just rings and goes to VM. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19519579 Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:40:47 EDT Re: Still better http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19518141 huntml :
said by truocchio :
Or overpriced for the most reliable and fastest mobile network speeds available.


Of course YMMV in cases like this, and VZ might be the best provider where you live/work, but I don't think the statement that VZ's data network is the fastest or most reliable, overall, is borne out by the data. According to EVDOforums.com, Sprint has better coverage and speed, overall.

quote:
Maybe you do not understand what it costs to provide services, especially services like mobile access nearly anywhere and everywhere you require. I think 60 or 70 or 80 is a bargain compared to what your option of building your own would be.


I guess what P. T. Barnum said was true... I pay $15/mo, *and* I don't get capped at 5 GB.

quote:
You have a choice, use it....or dont. No one if forcing you to buy their service and if you need the convenience and reliability of such a service than paying what its worth is a very good deal.

I am just sick of everyone playing the victim with telco's in highly competitive marketplace (mobile data/wireless). Competition and costs drive the market prices. If they were unreasonable then no one would buy them, since they have one of the largest customer bases I would say pricing is right on point.


Then again, people pay premium prices for water bottled in Iceland or Fiji and shipped to the US. Or as they used to say, 'Evian' is 'naive' spelled backwards.

Go figure.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19518141 Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:43:17 EDT Re: Still better http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19517973 truocchio : Overpriced in the sense of what your willing to pay? Or overpriced for the most reliable and fastest mobile network speeds available. Maybe you do not understand what it costs to provide services, especially services like mobile access nearly anywhere and everywhere you require. I think 60 or 70 or 80 is a bargain compared to what your option of building your own would be.

You have a choice, use it....or dont. No one if forcing you to buy their service and if you need the convenience and reliability of such a service than paying what its worth is a very good deal.

I am just sick of everyone playing the victim with telco's in highly competitive marketplace (mobile data/wireless). Competition and costs drive the market prices. If they were unreasonable then no one would buy them, since they have one of the largest customer bases I would say pricing is right on point.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19517973 Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:17:39 EDT Re: Still better http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19517847 jgkolt : In my home town, university, and new apartment i get better coverage with tmobile than with att or verizon. Usually verizon gets coverage most places but it doesnt mean they have better coverage in those places than others.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19517847 Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:57:54 EDT Re: Still better http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19517773 a333 : About goddam time!!!!!!!! Now if only they could get some balls and remove the cr@ppy 5 gig cap on their overpriced laptop connection card plans................
a333]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19517773 Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:45:01 EDT Re: Still better http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19517704 Vertickle : Better? In my opinion they all suck.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19517704 Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:34:19 EDT Still better http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19517559 NJxxxJon : Still better than ATT, T-Mobile and all the others receptonwise around my towns. :uhh:]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19517559 Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:10:35 EDT