<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Who Would Want &#x22;For Life&#x22; Pricing? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19521099</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:47:45 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:47:45 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Who Would Want &#x22;For Life&#x22; Pricing?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19522707</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1464969"><b>benc</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  clickie <A HREF="/useremail/u/1207899"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>One thing is certain, consumers always like these "lifetime" offers even though the realistic lifetime is just a few years.<br> </div>Surely the typical consumer understands that anything computer related (except computer monitors) isn't going to be "good enough" in just a few years.<br><br>Everything else that was "good enough" in the past is "good enough" now, or so it seems to me.  When I say "past," I mean within the last 30 years or so, so it covers mobile phones and microwave ovens.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19522707</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 01:16:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Who Would Want &#x22;For Life&#x22; Pricing?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19521099</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1207899"><b>clickie</b></A> : I think that's the bet Verizon is making; they'll have something better long before that and they can upsell more expensive services.<br><br>It's always more expensive to get new customers than it is to keep the ones you have.  This looks like an attempt to keep people around for a few years without hearing too much from them.  There's a two year contract, so I have to believe they figure within three years they'll have more compelling offerings rolling about about that time.<br><br>Might just be increased DSL speeds, might be fiber.<br><br>One thing is certain, consumers always like these "lifetime" offers even though the realistic lifetime is just a few years.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19521099</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:39:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Who Would Want &#x22;For Life&#x22; Pricing?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19519211</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1464969"><b>benc</b></A> : Not me.<br><br>Right now, 3.0Mbps down is sufficient for most people, almost all the time.  But, is it always going to be like that?<br><br>Everyone knows that software and data tends to get more bloated as time goes on, not less.<br><br>I would also hope that the price doesn't rise dramatically along with bandwidth requirements, although due to inflation I would expect prices to rise slightly from time to time.<br><br>I would strongly suspect that 3.0Mbps down at $28/mo. will be a RIP-OFF in ten years, even if the "for-life" pricing is supposed to ensure just that.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19519211</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:40:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
