<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: best value? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r19524347</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 05:46:48 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 05:46:48 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: best value?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19550555</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1154264"><b>FixManTx</b></A> : Exactly. Back almost 3 years ago when I was looking for non-cable broadband I went with Speakeasy because they didn't require a voice line. At the time it was $6/mo extra for a "dry" line but that's alot cheaper than $30+/mo. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19550555</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:34:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: best value?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19548922</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : That may be, but the customer is the one who should be making this determination, not the seller of the service.  This is typical monopoly-speak by AT$T...  we know whats good for you, you will buy our DSL and you will also buy a phone service to go with it, we dont want people to realize that land lines really are outdated and useless for most consumers and a way we can gouge all of you a whole lot more that you want us to.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19548922</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 11:23:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: best value?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19524347</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/519917"><b>Camelot One</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  swhitney2003 <A HREF="/useremail/u/826110"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>"a way to let customers know that buying several services at the same time is always the best value."<br><br>May not be better value if a customer does not need said other service....<br></div>If they didn't jack up the price of the "naked" service, that would be true. But when you can get DSL+basic phone for less than DSL alone, they are correct in stating that multiple services is the best value, even if you never use the phone line. <br><small>--<br>Intel Quad Core QX6700 @3500Mhz/Asus P5N32-E SLI/4x 1024Mb Corsair/WD 74Gb Raptor/PNY 7800GTs SLI/Antec 550 True Control/Custom water cooler</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19524347</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:34:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>best value?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19524266</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/826110"><b>swhitney2003</b></A> : "a way to let customers know that buying several services at the same time is always the best value."<br><br>May not be better value if a customer does not need said other service....<br><br>I have a cell phone, and it serves as a primary number for me. If I want DSL I shouldn't have to purchase a phone service also to get a cheaper rate. I won't benefit from the 'value' of this added service.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,19524266</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:18:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
