Some interesting selected findings

TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ ·Sprint Mobile Broa.. ·Comcast	reply to AnonymousPerson Re: Some interesting selected findings said by AnonymousPerson : For a signal to go 4.35 miles and then come back, it should take 46.7 microseconds. 44 milliseconds is an increase in latency by a factor of 1000. Can processing a ping really create that much overhead? That number was for a video streaming application and not a ping. It includes all the delay in both the hardware and the application. -- Internet News My BLOG My Web Page
	to forum · permalink · · 2007-12-01 13:41:41 ·
AnonymousPerson @verizon.net	reply to TKJunkMail For a signal to go 4.35 miles and then come back, it should take 46.7 microseconds. 44 milliseconds is an increase in latency by a factor of 1000. Can processing a ping really create that much overhead?
	to forum · permalink · 2007-12-01 13:37:00 ·
TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ ·Sprint Mobile Broa.. ·Comcast	From the PDF report: The furthest useable signal attained reached out to approximately 4.35 miles away from the WiMAX base station, using the outdoor CPE and 1.05 miles using the indoor CPE. The test concluded that we were able to get a maximum of 7.5 Mbps download and over 8.9 Mbps in upload speed. The test data shows the WiMAX network to provide adequate performance to be able to deliver streaming media encoded up to 4Mb/s.... The lab testing did not reveal any issues at the 700Kb or 2Mb rates. The 4Mb stream revealed only minimal issues. Data discards on the downlink measured 0.000341% and no discards on the uplink. Average round trip latency was approx 44 msec. -- Internet News My BLOG My Web Page
	to forum · permalink · · 2007-12-01 12:57:26 ·


Wednesday, 09-Dec 16:14:54	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com. page compression OFF